Silverstone has to "share"

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Nov 9, 2006 | 09:59 AM

PilotSi

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 1,820

Likes: 0

Silverstone has to "share"

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=37932

BE needs to end himself. He sucks.

Nov 9, 2006 | 10:10 AM

Tadashi

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 22,407

Likes: 0

From: Montgomery, NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotSi,Nov 9 2006, 01:59 PM

BE needs to end himself. He sucks.

I second that opinion! Silverstone needs to have their own race. Silverstones don't like to share

Nov 9, 2006 | 02:32 PM

RichUK

Former Moderator

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 45,694

Likes: 1

From: Oxfordshire

I think it would do Silverstone good to lose the GP, that way they might improve their facilities for spectators, which remain in my opinion, shite.

It seems to have done the trick for Spa.

Nov 9, 2006 | 08:46 PM

Tyraid2K

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 2,454

Likes: 0

From: Boise, Idaho

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichUK,Nov 9 2006, 03:32 PM

I think it would do Silverstone good to lose the GP, that way they might improve their facilities for spectators, which remain in my opinion, shite.

It seems to have done the trick for Spa.

as a TV viewer I've hated Spa's absence. It's my favorite and I could car less what the facilities are like.

Nov 18, 2006 | 04:36 PM

SlipAngle79

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 773

Likes: 0

From: St. Louis

What is the draw back in running more races? Too much $$ spent on traveling? I would love to see a 20+ race season. I miss Spa too and Hockenhiem is a shadow of what it used to/should be. Also missed are the V10's I heard at full song at the unfortunate US GP 05.