Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

06 Z4 R6 ENGINE!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #31  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

^ look at my .sig

My 04 weighs 2714 with wilwood 13" 6 piston brakes, OZ superleggera 18" wheels, dunlop supersport r compounds and a fujitsubo exhaust and t1r test pipe.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #32  
mrkim019's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 0
From: Saratoga
Default

Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #33  
Barry in Wyoming's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 1
From: Sheridan
Default

Originally Posted by X4DLuvOfSpeedX,Jan 17 2005, 06:19 AM
I didn't know there was a correlation between S2KI members' account age and knowledge or intelligence
There is.



#82
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 07:15 AM
  #34  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

[QUOTE=derryck,Jan 17 2005, 04:31 PM]
Like has already been pointed out...then your car WAS NOT showroom stock. My S2000 weighed right around 2,860 lbs. w/o driver after lighter wheels and my turbo set up with tools and spare removed.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 07:35 AM
  #35  
Ridgeway's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Jan 18 2005, 08:15 AM

So is it safe to say that the S2000 is approx 100 to 200 pounds lighter than the Z4? If so, to have the same power to weight ratio as the S2000 the Z4 would need 248 to 257 hp.
tq, gearing, & powerband
3.0L has 214 lb/ft @ 3500 rpm- quite a bit more than the s2000 & alot lower in the powerband...
the R6, or N54 as it will be officiailly desigated irrc, won't produce that much more tqw though, ~220 lb/ft- but it should give enough boost to make the z4 noticably faster instead of ever so slightly faster merely on paper as it currently is
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #36  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Calculating with toque and gearing, here's something interesting. Assuming no driveline losses, peak wheel torque for the Z4 in each gear is:

2,766
1,636
1,091
815
657
545

Peak wheel torque in each '04 S2000 gear:

2,514
1,641
1,188
932
778
650

Advantage Z4 in 1st gear, but advantage S2000 in every one thereafter.

That's not the entire story however, since the Z4 engine looses 14 lb-ft of torque between 3500rpm (peak torque) and 5500rpm (peak hp.) While in the same range for the S2000 (6500 to 7800 rpm) the S2000 looses 0.4 lb-ft. So the Z4 has higher peak torque, but the S2000 holds it longer during the individual gears.

It'd be nice to see a Z4 dyno chart, which would allow for better thrust vs speed calculations...
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #37  
derryck's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
From: Orange Park
Default

I am certainly not disputing that the S2000 is lighter and handles better however the I6 in the Z4 is torquier and has a broader powerband which allows alot more room for driver error. I think we all know hitting the wrong gear in the S means end of race.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #38  
Ridgeway's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Jan 18 2005, 09:26 AM
Calculating with toque and gearing, here's something interesting. Assuming no driveline losses, peak wheel torque for the Z4 in each gear is:

2,766
1,636
1,091
815
657

Peak wheel torque in each '04 S2000 gear:

2,514
1,641
1,188
932
778
650

Advantage Z4 in 1st gear, but advantage S2000 in every one thereafter.

That's not the entire story however, since the Z4 engine looses 14 lb-ft of torque between 3500rpm (peak torque) and 5500rpm (peak hp.) While in the same range for the S2000 (6500 to 7800 rpm) the S2000 looses 0.4 lb-ft. So the Z4 has higher peak torque, but the S2000 holds it longer during the individual gears.

It'd be nice to see a Z4 dyno chart, which would allow for better thrust vs speed calculations...
maybe it's just an omission, but there are only 5 #'s listed for the z4...?
is one just not listed, or did you use the 2.5L, as that's the only engine available with only a 5 speed, vs. the 3.0L's standard 6 speed tranny...?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #39  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Oops, sorry, 6th on the Z4 would yield 545 lb-ft at the wheel, compared to the S2000's 657. I'll update the above post, thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #40  
Station's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 2
From: Elk Grove
Default

Here is a thread where members have weighed their S2000s. Most are well below 2800. Mine is bone stock, and even with a full tank of gas it weighs less than what Honda claims.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:01 PM.