View Poll Results: Which would you chose?
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll
BMW M3, AMG C63 or Audi RS4
#11
I picked C63, actually.
Because IMHO a sports sedan should be devastatingly fast... you'll never get a 4000 pound car to handle like an Elise, so why try? But then, you have to have something that justifies the cost....
As for the M3, I still don't get why anyone would get one over a base Corvette or stripper base 911.
(of course if you were qualifying that with a comment of snowy weather... RS4!!!! )
Because IMHO a sports sedan should be devastatingly fast... you'll never get a 4000 pound car to handle like an Elise, so why try? But then, you have to have something that justifies the cost....
As for the M3, I still don't get why anyone would get one over a base Corvette or stripper base 911.
(of course if you were qualifying that with a comment of snowy weather... RS4!!!! )
#12
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USSA
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rai,Oct 4 2007, 07:00 PM
hard to answer this question especially as the GT-R and the IS-F shoud be in the mix.
How can I say since they have not been tested fully yet? But if I had to say I'd go:
1) GT-R
2) M3
3) IS-F
How can I say since they have not been tested fully yet? But if I had to say I'd go:
1) GT-R
2) M3
3) IS-F
PS..for the record I chose C63 myself. I think that car has a ton of potential being that it is detuned.
#13
Registered User
I know it's not 'new', but I have to wonder about the Cayman S in this group (for me) not essential that it has a rear seat. And tho lower powered it's also close to 30xx lbs (rather than 35xx lbs to close to 4000 lbs for the other cars).
#14
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USSA
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CKit,Oct 4 2007, 07:11 PM
I picked C63, actually.
Because IMHO a sports sedan should be devastatingly fast... you'll never get a 4000 pound car to handle like an Elise, so why try? But then, you have to have something that justifies the cost....
As for the M3, I still don't get why anyone would get one over a base Corvette or stripper base 911.
(of course if you were qualifying that with a comment of snowy weather... RS4!!!! )
Because IMHO a sports sedan should be devastatingly fast... you'll never get a 4000 pound car to handle like an Elise, so why try? But then, you have to have something that justifies the cost....
As for the M3, I still don't get why anyone would get one over a base Corvette or stripper base 911.
(of course if you were qualifying that with a comment of snowy weather... RS4!!!! )
I was in Greenwich, CT for the past 3 days and I have never seen so many BMWs per square mile in my life. Imagine NYC taxis as BMWs and that is the streets of Greenwich, to give you an idea.
I saw an RS4 today and said damn that is hot and it stuck out because it wasn't a BMW. Then I figured wtf...poll time, and added the 3 cars for voting.
#15
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USSA
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=rai,Oct 4 2007, 07:16 PM] I know it's not 'new', but I have to wonder about the Cayman S in this group (for me) not essential that it has a rear seat.
#16
[QUOTE=GPMike,Oct 4 2007, 07:20 PM] I started this poll because of the RS4.
I was in Greenwich, CT for the past 3 days and I have never seen so many BMWs per square mile in my life.
I was in Greenwich, CT for the past 3 days and I have never seen so many BMWs per square mile in my life.
#17
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USSA
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=CKit,Oct 4 2007, 07:39 PM] (Then you should have said snowy Connecticut... too many Cali and Texas guys so I voted as if a dry weather choice)
IDK, I think the RS4 looks nice... but I still think it looks an awful lot like an A4 (which why we picked up one).
IDK, I think the RS4 looks nice... but I still think it looks an awful lot like an A4 (which why we picked up one).
#20
Registered User
BMW M3 had been more enjoyable to drive in the past compared to its MB and Audi counterparts.
With its recent review and weight catching up to C63, I am not sure if that is the case anymore. Its styling is like a skank w/ too much makeup and the interior is cheap.
I would pick the C63 in a heartbeat.
With its recent review and weight catching up to C63, I am not sure if that is the case anymore. Its styling is like a skank w/ too much makeup and the interior is cheap.
I would pick the C63 in a heartbeat.