Continuation of Socrates NSX thread
Originally posted by KaiWang
damn u need anger management and maybe sharpen up on ur reading skills..
i bet ur one of those geeks who nit pick on unimportant details while missing the overall point of things huh?
sheesh
damn u need anger management and maybe sharpen up on ur reading skills..
i bet ur one of those geeks who nit pick on unimportant details while missing the overall point of things huh?
sheesh
I love how now that another NSX driver is coming in disputing some of their haughty claims for this car with his own experience and knowledge, they're getting on his case.
All this and yet still not one NSX critic here, including myself, said anything about the NSX being crappy.
Originally posted by kumar75150
ALMOST 400 hp WITH a blower
ALMOST 400 hp WITH a blower
having just spent a day with my uncle while visiting family here in minnesota, i got a chance to drive a handful of his cars. so, yesterday i got to drive a red 2001 NSX, black 2004 911 turbo cabriolet, red 1998 viper gts, and a red 2004 corvette c5. and long story short, i spent aout 6 hours with these cars driving around the rural roads of east st. paul, and i can say that even though the nsx is greatly underpowered, it is still very nice to drive, very smooth, awesome gearbox, awesome handling, awesome noise it makes, and awesome looks. of course it didnt have the kick of even the C5, but it would make a very nice semi-exotic that you could drive everyday (which he does a lot of the time).
Originally posted by steve c
Actually, all of my points were in fact correct. If you wish to produce misinformation, by all means be my guest, but expect to be corrected.
Actually, all of my points were in fact correct. If you wish to produce misinformation, by all means be my guest, but expect to be corrected.
Funny, I have found over the years that there is a very loud very small minority of people who hate on the NSX in Honda forums. I think I've learned to attribute it to a need for attention more then anything.



