Damn, the Hellcat is fast!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 23, 2015 | 10:04 AM

#41

Piero914

Joined: Oct 2014

Posts: 182

Likes: 3

From: NY

Good! Now C7Z owners will know what it's like to own an s2000. Constantly losing to fat ugly cars lol

Jan 23, 2015 | 10:13 AM

#42

blkwidow

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 1,735

Likes: 0

From: Paradise Hills / SD

Meh you're taking it out of context.. If it was a track focused car, then I'm sure it'd be lighter, probably less hp. I was specifically talking about competing with cars like the corvette. I didn't say it can't or shouldn't be used as one. But whatever we all know the people buying these cars are buying for the hp.

Jan 23, 2015 | 10:21 AM

#43

FearlessFife

Community Organizer

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 7,630

Likes: 51

From: Kansas City, MO

Jan 23, 2015 | 11:01 AM

#44

JonBoy

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 19,734

Likes: 247

Jan 23, 2015 | 01:25 PM

#45

rob-2

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 8,655

Likes: 171

It's ironic, because for it's fattiness of 4400lbs it out performs the S2000 in every area....

Jan 23, 2015 | 02:03 PM

#46

JonBoy

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 19,734

Likes: 247

Nope - it can't lower its top nearly as fast...

Jan 23, 2015 | 05:37 PM

#47

FearlessFife

Community Organizer

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 7,630

Likes: 51

From: Kansas City, MO

Quote:

Originally Posted by rob-2

It's ironic, because for it's fattiness of 4400lbs it out performs the S2000 in every area....

C'mon man, calm down, not everything on the internet is serious - it's supposed to be funny. Who said it's "OMG SO TERRIBLE COMPARED TO THE S2000!!!" Gotdamn, lighten up a little...it's call sarcasm, Google it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonBoy

Nope - it can't lower its top nearly as fast...