Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

how does a new M3 stack up?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #61  
05YellowEVO8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NYC
Default

I wonder how many people knew this:

I read in a BMW dealer brochure for the new V8 M3 that the M3 coupe will come with a Carbon fiber roof???


when I first read that I was like wow.....baller
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #62  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Dec 13 2007, 09:12 PM


I do notmean to bash the Cayman or the Cayman S in any way they are great cars and I'd love one.

(as pointed out in a post earlier, as a sports car the Cayman/Boxster is way better than an M3. Same thing, as a sports coupe or sports sedan the M3 is better than a Cayman. My point is the M3 is not a direct comparison to a Cayman S or Corvette, but the M3 is a compromise which does a few things well straight line seems to be one thing it does well. I view M3s almost more like a European Mustang GT (ie. quick in a line with rear seat, not the most nimble on a back road as sports car which usually weigh hundreds of pounds less).
rai, I was actually responding to OnehotS2k's first sentence in his post just before yours. (should have used the quote)

If you want to bash the Cayman, feel free to do so. It's not my offspring, so my feelings won't be hurt. It's also not for everyone, and I like the open exchange of opinions on all sorts of cars here....even when I don't agree.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #63  
rai's Avatar
rai
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 10
From: mount airy
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,Dec 13 2007, 07:25 PM
If you want to bash the Cayman, feel free to do so. It's not my offspring, so my feelings won't be hurt. It's also not for everyone, and I like the open exchange of opinions on all sorts of cars here....even when I don't agree.
I have read nothing but good things about the Cayman (CAR magazine and EVO magazine both say how great they handle and how they are just the right size etc..) but as a point UK and US are different countries and I can see points for both the M3 or Cayman depending on what you need.

I have a S2000 and if getting a M3 I could keep it as a counterpoint while the Cayman strikes me as a S2000 replacement (I would not keep the S2000 if I got a Corvette or Boxster or Cayman).
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #64  
Iceman1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Dec 13 2007, 10:12 PM
I view M3s almost more like a European Mustang GT
you say that again, you'll be banned from every car forum on earth... for 414 years... and it will pass to subsequent generations...



guys regarding the M3's torque curve... i wasnt saying its higher than an RS4's... an RS4 has slightly more displacement... its expected that it has more... an obivously its a superbly built engine... i was meaning... its hard to maintain a decently high flat curve, on a high RPM engine... (theyre mostly going up or down) without a large amount of displacement or F/I.. however, with just the right fine tuning, both the flat torque, and the high rpm/high HP can be attained... and thats what BMW did... (same with Audi)...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #65  
rai's Avatar
rai
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 10
From: mount airy
Default

[QUOTE=Iceman1,Dec 13 2007, 07:30 PM]you say that again, you'll be banned from every car forum on earth...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #66  
rai's Avatar
rai
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 10
From: mount airy
Default

[QUOTE]We're admittedly smitten over the new BMW M3 coupe and have passed along every morsel of information we've come across over the past few months. With the new M3 officially unveiled, however, the only real question left unanswered is how much it will cost. Today we've learned that if you live in Her Majesty's kingdom, a new 2008 BMW M3 coupe will cost you
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #67  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Dec 13 2007, 09:30 PM
I have read nothing but good things about the Cayman (CAR magazine and EVO magazine both say how great they handle and how they are just the right size etc..) but as a point UK and US are different countries and I can see points for both the M3 or Cayman depending on what you need.

I have a S2000 and if getting a M3 I could keep it as a counterpoint while the Cayman strikes me as a S2000 replacement (I would not keep the S2000 if I got a Corvette or Boxster or Cayman).
There's no accounting for different tastes, needs, etc. in cars.

I was interested in the 335i and E46 M3 around the time I got my CS, but while they're great cars, I couldn't stomach them as replacements for my S2000 (my wife said she'd get sick on Hill Country drives in the 335 due to the extra suspension movement).

Aside from the lack of rear seats, the Cayman is as daily usable as an M3 IMO. It's comfy, has good outward visibility, reasonable ride/noise levels, and lots of cargo capacity.

I wanted to keep my S2000 as a counterpart when I bought the CS, but had no extra garage space and wasn't willing to leave the S2000 outdoors. No loss, as after the CS was broken in, I realized the S2000 wouldn't have gotten much use anyway.

Part of me really wants to like the M3, but another part just leaves me cold for some reason. I'll have to drive one when they hit the US to draw my own conclusions, but it's not very compelling as long as I don't need rear seats (even kids won't change that, since we have an Avalanche and a Jetta TDI).
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #68  
DavidM's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

however, with just the right fine tuning, both the flat torque, and the high rpm/high HP can be attained... and thats what BMW did...

The previous two M3 engines had similar characteristic. ie. flat torque curve between ~3000 and 7000rpm.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #69  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,Dec 13 2007, 06:04 PM
OTOH, a car that takes more skill to drive well can be more gratifying. It's kind of neat to get to a certain level by consciously working to develop your skills and molding them to your car's unique behavior, as opposed to a car anyone can hop in and go fast on.
I totally agree and that's my philosophy.

I was just replying to the people who think car mag racing by professionals somehow applies to their usage on the street.

I think I'd rather have a Cayman S than a GT-R for the "fun" car.

Now for the dedicated daily driver... that's a different story.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #70  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Onehots2k,Dec 13 2007, 06:33 PM
I mean how many of us on here have gotten C6's or moved on to cars that have some serious acceleration? I would say a lot. Many on here have given up the ''fun'' car for something with practicality.
And a fair number of those people miss their S2000s and wind up going back to one....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 PM.