Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

May C&D

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #41  
Mr Payne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield
Default

It's quoted at 660rwhp. Seems bogus, are you sure that isn't with nitrous?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #42  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #43  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by FRM
Street driven Mustang with SHM stroker V8.

Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #44  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

Originally posted by Mr Payne
It's quoted at 660rwhp. Seems bogus, are you sure that isn't with nitrous?
Even more then that...the verbage under the stroker motors is "components rated for 650HP." It doesn't even say the motor will produce that much!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #45  
Mr Payne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield
Default

You don't say? FRM, brilliant use of irrelevant and bogus info.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #46  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

^^ um, look at the sidebar.

For those numbers (660 hp) out of a 4.6-5.2 engine, you will need some form of power adder - not sure if FRM knows that. SHM builds engines for people to use with nitrous or FI, they also build strokers that put out 450 hp and ready for more.

In a displacement-limited situation, DOHC rules, while in a max-horsepower-limited or size-and-weight-restricted situation, OHV tends to be a better choice. It all depends on how much money the competing parties are willing to throw at the problem, however. You can easily build a DOHC 4.6 to make similar power to a much larger displacement stock LS1, for example. It just costs more, and likely will be a little heavier and a lot larger.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #47  
FRM's Avatar
FRM
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

Pushrod V8 has a small advantage in front-engine cars.

DOHC V8 is the better choice for mid-engine cars.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #48  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

[QUOTE]Pushrod V8 has a small advantage in front-engine cars.

DOHC V8 is the better choice for mid-engine cars.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 04:40 AM
  #49  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally posted by FRM
Pushrod V8 has a small advantage in front-engine cars.

DOHC V8 is the better choice for mid-engine cars.

I'm sure you can provide some facts or analysis (even just one of your usual magazine quotes) to back this up...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 05:47 AM
  #50  
Slamnasty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally posted by FRM
Pushrod V8 has a small advantage in front-engine cars.

DOHC V8 is the better choice for mid-engine cars.

If that's so, why was the GT40 such a resounding success?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:24 AM.