Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

New Alfa Romeo Spider / next gen Mazda MX5

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-30-2013, 11:27 AM
  #21  

 
AZS2KDancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,321
Received 29 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

It still looks like Mazda kept the smiley face. No likey. The Alpha looks better so far.
Old 07-31-2013, 02:10 AM
  #22  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AZS2KDancer
It still looks like Mazda kept the smiley face. No likey. The Alpha looks better so far.
What's an "Alpha"?
Old 07-31-2013, 09:17 AM
  #23  

 
RMurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,647
Received 192 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Originally Posted by AZS2KDancer' timestamp='1375212461' post='22696349
It still looks like Mazda kept the smiley face. No likey. The Alpha looks better so far.
What's an "Alpha"?
It's the version released before the Beta. I hear they come in soups too.

It's a typo. Sometimes the fingers type what they want regardless of the brain knowing better. It's like typing its when you mean it's or here when you mean hear. We know the difference and we know which is correct; we just goof sometimes. Well...not me. I never goof. It's always the autocorrect that gets it wrong.
Old 08-02-2013, 05:35 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
SpudRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As usual, the Italian bodywork looks stunning and 2,200 lbs is incredible. But.......they said 160 hp in the U.S. version. That puts the car at 13.75 lbs per hp. Maybe 8 second 0-60? Solidly in boring territory. And like most forced induction engines, it makes peak power @ a relatively low 5,500 rpm. So no 4.77 differential to give it mechanical advantage. Too bad they didn't at least least get the power to weight ratio down to the 10.0 lb mark. With 250 hp, this would have been a "must have". As is, it's just a nice looking alternative to a Miata. C'est la vie. At least the engineering should be reliable.
Old 08-03-2013, 04:11 AM
  #25  
Syn
Registered User

 
Syn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SpudRacer
As usual, the Italian bodywork looks stunning and 2,200 lbs is incredible. But.......they said 160 hp in the U.S. version. That puts the car at 13.75 lbs per hp. Maybe 8 second 0-60? Solidly in boring territory. And like most forced induction engines, it makes peak power @ a relatively low 5,500 rpm. So no 4.77 differential to give it mechanical advantage. Too bad they didn't at least least get the power to weight ratio down to the 10.0 lb mark. With 250 hp, this would have been a "must have". As is, it's just a nice looking alternative to a Miata. C'est la vie. At least the engineering should be reliable.
Agreed, but (and I know it's not necessarily relevant) just like any other stock turbocharged car you can very cheaply replace the turbo to take care of the power deficit. Hopefully the car comes with oversized injectors, fuel pump, and a clutch + drivetrain that can handle +50-100% horsepower without being touched. In that case you could get a car with Italian bodywork, 2200 lbs, and somewhere between 6.875-8.4lbs per hp for a couple thousand more dollars invested. Obviously this investment goes up quickly if the car is built with weak components.
Old 08-03-2013, 04:41 AM
  #26  

 
mosesbotbol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,168
Received 120 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Back the 80's, Callaway developed a turbo GTV6 (Alfa 2.5 V6 engine). The story goes that Callaway ran the engine at red line to see how long it could go before breaking and that engine went further than any engine they had modified to date; including Corvette. Will the new stuff be as good? Alfa has been making aluminum hemi engines longer than just about anyone.

I agree with most on here, that both versions are going to need a little more power, but let's see how it comes out. It could be a "foot to the floor" all the time kind of ride which would be typical and appropriate for this genre of car.
Old 08-03-2013, 05:27 AM
  #27  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpudRacer
As usual, the Italian bodywork looks stunning and 2,200 lbs is incredible. But.......they said 160 hp in the U.S. version. That puts the car at 13.75 lbs per hp. Maybe 8 second 0-60?
FR-S/BRZ are at that power/weight, 0-60 in ~6.5, nowhere near 8 seconds. Honestly, it will be quick enough for me for DD duty. The way I drive the S on the street (practically never in VTEC), it's a ~16 lb/hp car, doesn't detract from the every-day fun-to-driveness at all. I'd definitely rather see a lot more cars like this than all the oversized/overweight/overpriced "sports" and sporty cars the market is flooded with.
Old 08-03-2013, 06:12 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
SpudRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And oh yeah, didn't mean to slight the Mazda designers. The Japanese body work is a stunner too. Evolutionary but very much a step forward in attractiveness. Both roadsters look like more expensive cars than they are. Too bad GM didn't endow the Kappa triplets with this sort of design quality.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spaceentity
Car and Bike Talk
50
02-19-2014 08:58 AM
Gymkata
Car and Bike Talk
33
04-11-2012 01:24 PM
madkimchi
Car and Bike Talk
80
03-26-2012 09:24 PM
Birel186
South Florida
8
01-11-2008 01:11 PM
PilotSi
S2000 Racing and Competition
17
01-04-2006 04:05 PM



Quick Reply: New Alfa Romeo Spider / next gen Mazda MX5



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 AM.