Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Putting Acceleration in Perspective

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 04:28 AM
  #1  
DaGou's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 3
From: Myrtle Beach
Default Putting Acceleration in Perspective

Not sure where this came from but it was on the internet so it has to be true.


One Top Fuel dragster outfitted with a 500 cubic-inch replica Dodge (actually Keith Black, etc)
Hemi engine makes more horsepower (8,000 HP) than the first 4 rows of cars at NASCAR's Daytona 500.

Under full throttle, a dragster engine will consume 11.2 gallons of nitro methane per second;
a fully loaded Boeing 747 consumes jet fuel at the same rate but with 25% less energy being produced.

* A stock Dodge Hemi V8 engine cannot produce enough power to merely drive the dragster's supercharger.

* With 3000 CFM of air being rammed in by the supercharger on overdrive, the fuel mixture is compressed
into a near-solid form before ignition. Cylinders run on the verge of hydraulic lockup at full throttle.

* At the stoichio metric 1.7:1 air/fuel mixture for nitro methane the flame front temperature measures 7050 degrees F.

* Nitro methane burns yellow. The spectacular white flame seen above the stacks at night is raw burning hydrogen,
dissociated from atmospheric water vapor by the searing exhaust gases.

* Dual magnetos supply 44 amps to each spark plug. Which is typically the output of an electric arc welder in each cylinder.

* Spark plug electrodes are totally consumed during a pass. After 1/2 way thru the run, the engine is 'dieseling'
from compression and the glow of the exhaust valves at 1400 degrees F. The engine can only be shut down by cutting the fuel flow.

* If spark momentarily fails early in the run, unburned nitro builds up in the affected cylinders and then explodes
with enough sufficient force to blow the cylinder heads off the block in pieces or split the block in half !!

* Dragsters reach over 300 MPH +... before you have completed reading this sentence.

* In order to exceed 300 MPH in 4.5 seconds, a dragster must accelerate an average of over 4 G's.

In order to reach 200 MPH well before reaching half-track, at launch the acceleration approaches 8 G's.

* Top Fuel engines turn approximately 540 revolutions from light to light!

* Including the burnout, the engine must only survive 900 revolutions under load.

* The redline is actually quite high at 9500 RPM.

* THE BOTTOM LINE: Assuming all the equipment is paid for, the pit crew is working for free,
& NOTHING BLOWS UP, each run will cost an estimated $1,000 per second.

0 to 100 MPH in .8 seconds (the first 60 feet of the run)
0 to 200 MPH in 2.2 seconds (the first 350 feet of the run)
6G - forces at the starting line (nothing accelerates faster on land)
6G - negative G-forces upon deployment of twin 'chutes at 300 MPH>

An NHRA Top Fuel Dragster accelerates quicker than any other land vehicle on earth . .
quicker than a jet fighter plane . . . quicker than the space shuttle....or snapping your fingers !!

The current Top Fuel dragster elapsed time record is 4.420 seconds for the quarter-mile (2004, Doug Kalitta).
The top speed record is 337.58 MPH as measured over the last 66' of the run (2005, Tony Schumacher).

Let's now put this all into perspective:

Imagine this...........You are driving a new $140,000 Lingenfelter twin-turbo powered Corvette Z06.
Over a mile up the road, a Top Fuel dragster is staged & ready to 'launch' down a quarter-mile strip as you pass.
You have the advantage of a flying start. You run the 'Vette hard, on up through the gears and blast across the
starting line & pass the dragster at an honest 200 MPH.... The 'tree' goes green for both of you at that exact moment.

The dragster departs & starts after you. You keep your foot buried hard to the floor, and suddenly you hear an incredibly
brutally screaming whine that sears and pummels your eardrums & within a mere 3 seconds the dragster effortlessly catches
& passes you. He beats you to the finish line, a quarter-mile away from where you just passed him. Think about it –
from a standing start, the dragster had spotted you 200 MPH.....and it not only caught, but nearly blasted you off the planet
when he passed you within a mere 1320 foot long race !!!!

Now that……..is acceleration.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 04:38 AM
  #2  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

I've seen this before. I believe almost all of it. The only one I don't agree with is...

"Under full throttle, a dragster engine will consume 11.2 gallons of nitro methane per second"
I can't imagine that these cars have 30 gallon tanks.

Anywho, here is a pretty cool, related video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGTbQuhhluY
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 05:02 AM
  #3  
CosmosMpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,485
Likes: 21
Default

Crazy stats. Imagine how big the fuel hoses have to be to supply 11.2 gallons of fuel a second.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 07:59 AM
  #4  
EastS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 11
From: SW Florida
Default

What if I was at WOT in the new upcoming veyron instead of the z06
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 09:49 AM
  #5  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

imagine how much faster it'd be if VTEC just kicked in, yo.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 10:00 AM
  #6  
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 119
Default

This list was making the rounds when Pythagorus was in diapers.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
stockae92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

I was expecting "nerd wins" at the end

Nice stats
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 02:04 PM
  #8  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Pretty mind blowing that the engine only has to survive 900 revolutions under load.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 02:17 PM
  #9  
windhund116's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,360
Likes: 1,795
Default

" Quicker than a jet fighter plane. "

Jet Fighter taking off on land? Or from an Aircraft Carrier? An A/C acceleration is dependent on the steam catapult. Not totally, the jet's engines.

I doubt the acceleration is better than a F/A 18, once the plane is in air, at combat altitude.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2015 | 02:39 PM
  #10  
budgy's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 863
Likes: 56
Default

I would actually be surprised if a fighter jet could hit 4g's strictly under thrust; under a lift or a dive I am sure they can hit a lot more.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 AM.