Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Road and track mx5 vs s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-30-2016, 11:09 AM
  #21  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,697
Received 225 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

I wish every vehicle of mine had a digital gauge. I loved the gauge cluster on the S2000, in terms of functionality. It was easy to use, center properly, allowed you to see speed and rpm at a quick glance and generally minimized the clutter or details that weren't truly needed. I still think the S2000 has the best "basic" interior of any car. Everything you regularly need is at your finger tips. It's low on frills but it's high on functionality and practical use.

My wife's Civic (which I just inherited for my beater) has a digital speedometer as well and I love not having to truly look at the speedo. One less thing to focus on (with any real effort) in the car...
Old 08-30-2016, 11:34 AM
  #22  

 
Nerd-Vol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 424
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I like the digital gauges. I am a sucker for information, so I do wish it had an oil temp and/or oil pressure gauge.

I genuinely feel as though the S2000 will age quite nicely. I don't think the NB has or the NC will.
Old 08-30-2016, 11:39 AM
  #23  
Registered User

 
honda606's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cahooa
I wanted to stop reading after he said the S2K was uglier than the Miata, I think he needs to have his prescription checked. I think a stock Miata looks like a 4x4 tic tac. I think the S2K looks good at every angle.
The S2000 will always hold a special place in my enthusiast heart but sadly it is looking quite dated these days. I've always loved the front end but have never been crazy about the rear.
Old 08-30-2016, 11:48 AM
  #24  
Registered User

 
honda606's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by titch
I think it's only really fair to compare the S2000 to the NB & NC Miatas, as they are of the same vintage. That it's still considered a fair comparison should speak volumes of the S2000.
The S2000 was never designed to compete with the Miata so I really can't see it as a fair comparison. I see where you're coming from with regards to the age of the two but the S2000 was built to compete with the Boxster and Boxster S. In today's market value the MSRP on a new S2000 would be $40k+. Totally different category from the Miata despite the two being roadsters by design.
Old 08-30-2016, 02:53 PM
  #25  
Registered User

 
titch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, no, true, they weren't direct competitors, but if someone is wanting to compare them, at least keep them of the same vintage.



FWIW, I've not long since swapped from a modified NA Miata (~150bhp with ITBs) to a lightly tuned '02 S2000, and the way I always describe it when people ask is that it's just like a Miata on steroids. Everything is amped up that little bit (interior space aside, that's amped down, although I do prefer the dash & layout), it's simply bigger, faster and more aggressive.
Old 09-03-2016, 07:22 AM
  #26  

 
MaximumAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 157
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Haha. This was the quintessential Miata fanboy rant... exactly like what you hear from about 80% of the guys on the Miata forum. "Oh, the Miata is more affordable. Come on, it's still in production! It killed the S2000! It won!" Very little about which is more exciting to drive, which is generally faster on track, which has the complete package (great handling AND a great engine, not just great handling...), etc.

As for the styling, the guy said his favorite design before the ND was the NC... I know very, very few people who think the NC is an attractive looking car in any way. As for the ND, I do think it looks pretty good, & it's more modern looking than the S2000, but I still think the S2000 is a good looking car. I feel the same about other older cars like the S15 Silvia, FD RX7, NSX, etc....

It's a bit strange to me he says that the ND has nailed the handling and has raised the bar well above all of the others. Nearly every reviewer has complained about the extremely soft stock suspension, and I believe many of them also complained about the light steering. I'm sure it handles really well with aftermarket coilovers, but have a hard time believing it would be night and day vs an S2000 or RX7 with equally good aftermarket coilovers. =P
Old 09-06-2016, 11:13 AM
  #27  
Registered User

 
zumns2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Name:  2E1C36AB-4FDC-4C43-9A57-98916F15B29B_zpsuczqi7ft.jpg
Views: 105
Size:  329.0 KB

After buying my s2 my dad realized just how much my mom had yarned of owning a convertible.

Now with all of us out of the house my mom got her wish...

And i must say that after driving it ... the MX-5 really does have a way of putting a smile on your face.

Yes the suspension is soft and you do get a bit of body roll but the mechanical grip it generates is phenomenal and the car is sooo predicatable which makes driving it fast easy and awesome.

Not to mention its body styling is gorgeous.

would i trade my s2 for a new MX-5 ... YIKES! that is a loaded question ... lets see well , The fully loaded Grand Touring model weights less then our cars... My moms has the auto transmision with paddle shifers, heated seats, navi, bose audio, bluetooth, backup sensors, lane departure sensors, cruise control radar sensors, has less cabin noise, and comfy seats all of this makes the MX-5 one hell of a great daily convertible roadster.

Of course it's not as powerful as our s2 and doesn't handle as good stock for stock, but it is amazing to me that 16 years later all that technology was crammed into the MX-5 without sacrificing weight...

now most of us would probably perfer the club version which is MT AND LIGHTER then my moms AT GT

Final thoughts... no i would not trade my s2, BUT! if down the road Mazda finds more power ... I might change my tune

couple more pics

Name:  1797DF2D-7BBD-4D5C-9902-6997AE4B3987_zps36botcvu.jpg
Views: 89
Size:  264.4 KB

Name:  001A1D7D-8608-4C09-B688-D03BE04BA138_zpsyforuehl.jpg
Views: 101
Size:  266.0 KB
Old 09-06-2016, 11:56 AM
  #28  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,394
Received 268 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Where did you hear/read that the Grand Touring Miata weighs as much as an AP1 S2000? Because I'm pretty sure that is incorrect.
Old 09-06-2016, 12:01 PM
  #29  

 
TsukubaCody's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,784
Received 426 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

^That.

All ND's are much lighter than any production S2000.
Old 09-06-2016, 12:07 PM
  #30  
Registered User

 
zumns2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
Where did you hear/read that the Grand Touring Miata weighs as much as an AP1 S2000? Because I'm pretty sure that is incorrect.

allow me to correct myself

MX-5 Grand touring GT auto 2,380

MX-5 club sport MT 2,332

ap1 was 2,809


Quick Reply: Road and track mx5 vs s2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 PM.