SL55 and the E55. A Contradicting Statement??
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,585
Likes: 0
From: Roseville, CA
AMG's are monsters. I saw a stock C32 AMG eat up a Stock M3 both 2003 models and both driven by professionals. Sad thing is, the C32 AMG is the cheapest of the AMG's!! They just get more powerful!! 
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Some things to consider guys... While the E55 is roughly 230 lbs. lighter, it has a 2.65:1 rear-end compared to the SL55's 2.82:1. The SL also has wider wheels/tires in the back: 285/35-18s on 18 x 9.5 wheels vs. 265/35-18s on 18 x 9s, thus the ability to put more power down to the ground (rather the ASR being less obtrusive due to the additional levels of grip).
Trust me, drive both and you will see thay are just as fust. They are close enough where even the most accurate butt-dyno will not be able to tell a difference. But the SL
sounds and looks significantly faster.
Trust me, drive both and you will see thay are just as fust. They are close enough where even the most accurate butt-dyno will not be able to tell a difference. But the SL
sounds and looks significantly faster.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Sr2oD3
I've heard the E55 or the SL55 is faster than the Lambo Bat from 100-150, which one is true??
I've heard the E55 or the SL55 is faster than the Lambo Bat from 100-150, which one is true??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post