Solstice
[QUOTE=Anrosphynx,Feb 13 2006, 10:17 AM]Not making a dent? are you nuts? Did you not read your original post before you posted? Average lot time is 15 days. Most stealerships can't even get them onto the lot before they sell.
Originally Posted by speed_bump,Feb 13 2006, 12:02 PM
Porsche engines won the F1 championship in 84 and 85 under the name TAG Turbos and Audi won many a grand prix back when they were still called Auto Union.
Either way it's a stupid way to choose which car to buy.
Originally Posted by Suzukaboy,Feb 13 2006, 12:30 PM
I wouldn't call 1200 cars (15.8% of 7435) much of a dent in the 16-36 age market. If they're not concerned, why the Ludacris ad? Surely that ad was not aimed at the 36+age group which purchased about 6250 cars during the same period.
As far as price gouging dealers, price one out on the web and you'll see that the average selling price of $25,194 is about what what you would expect given the list of options available. The sales pace is brisk but the dealers, on average, are not getting much, if any, above MSRP.
Remember when the new Tbird came out? Dealers were getting thousands over MSRP. When those intial buyers bought however there was no one behind them and the car was eventually cancelled.
GM can't afford to let that happen to Solstice so they must broaden the market appeal of the car beyond the usual people who buy GM cars. There is a whole generation of younger people who don't even think about GM cars and GM needs to get them to at least check the Solstice out. They won't steal many sales from Miata and others if only the good old boys are looking.
Actually I hope they make it. Competition keeps everyone on their toes.
As far as price gouging dealers, price one out on the web and you'll see that the average selling price of $25,194 is about what what you would expect given the list of options available. The sales pace is brisk but the dealers, on average, are not getting much, if any, above MSRP.
Remember when the new Tbird came out? Dealers were getting thousands over MSRP. When those intial buyers bought however there was no one behind them and the car was eventually cancelled.
GM can't afford to let that happen to Solstice so they must broaden the market appeal of the car beyond the usual people who buy GM cars. There is a whole generation of younger people who don't even think about GM cars and GM needs to get them to at least check the Solstice out. They won't steal many sales from Miata and others if only the good old boys are looking.
Actually I hope they make it. Competition keeps everyone on their toes.
The average selling price is 25k+ for the car with options, not including dealer mark up, taxes, title, ect. Dealer markup is never included in the average price. I don't know where you live, but here they are marking them up 5k, and they still can't keep them on the showroom floor.
I would call 16 percent a dent especially seeing the limited availability of the car, and the fact that many buyers put down money many many months before the car was released. How many 18 year olds do you know that would plunk down 5k and wait a year before they would actually get the car? Now does the demographics make a little more sense?
GM will have no problems selling this car. And they WILL take sales from the miata. How many hardcore "BUY AMERICAN" individuals have been waiting for a product that was in the miata class? Until now, neither Ford nor GM has produced such a product. Now they have a product they can get behind, and a price they can afford.
I am not going to say that it is a superior product, I am just saying, don't knock it, because it was a good choice by GM and they will sell very well. I have no worries, no matter how people bash on it.
Originally Posted by rockville,Feb 12 2006, 05:02 PM
I would be curious what percent traded in Firebirds. 50% would indicate something much different than say 2% with all other models each being less than 2% trade in.
I certainly don't think it's surprising that the Firebird is the leading trade in candidate though. Pontiac as a brand still has a rich hertitage and strong brand loyalty among its core fans. This is the first sporty car Pontiac has offered since the Firebird was last offered in the 2002 model year. So it stands to reason that the Pontiac fans would be first in line on the preorder and wait lists.
What was the leading trade in candidate on the 2000 Honda S2000? I'd be willing to bet it was some sporty Honda product - probably a Prelude or an Integra?
It's also not surprising that the main demographic for the first wave was the 35-55 age males. The first adopters of the S2000 fell largely into that same demographic as well. As someone else already pointed out - it's mainly middle-aged males with large disposable incomes who are buying such sportscars as a weekend car.
Andrew
Originally Posted by Anrosphynx,Feb 13 2006, 01:53 PM
After driving the MX-5, I think it is debateable that it is a much better car. The interior is kind of crappy for Mazda. Acceleration is lackluster (as it is with the soltice) and styling is still "chick car"...

the new 1 latch top is just effin BRILLIANT. i believe that falls under the interior category. there's more leg room, thigh room, shoulder room. the interior plastic is FAR better - dare i saw elegant? - than the stuff used in the '99 and no worse than a base model mazda6 (i sold these cars, i think i'd know).
re: acceleration... uhhh.. if it's no slower than solstice, then how about calling it appropriate for the class? mazda3s are no faster.. this whole point is moot as the car, since '89, has NEVER been about pure acceleration. you have never, willl never, see one single marketing point mentioning how quick this car is in a straight line vs. *****
re: "chick car" whatever. solstice can be considered a chic car, as can most 2 seat roadsters. there are more miatas on the road than any other roadster, guess there are a lot of 'chics' in this country?
now. when does the sky go on sale? thinking about trading the s2k in....
Originally Posted by ToeKneeC,Feb 13 2006, 03:52 PM
and these are .. all opinions 
the new 1 latch top is just effin BRILLIANT. i believe that falls under the interior category. there's more leg room, thigh room, shoulder room. the interior plastic is FAR better - dare i saw elegant? - than the stuff used in the '99 and no worse than a base model mazda6 (i sold these cars, i think i'd know).
re: acceleration... uhhh.. if it's no slower than solstice, then how about calling it appropriate for the class? mazda3s are no faster.. this whole point is moot as the car, since '89, has NEVER been about pure acceleration. you have never, willl never, see one single marketing point mentioning how quick this car is in a straight line vs. *****
re: "chick car" whatever. solstice can be considered a chic car, as can most 2 seat roadsters. there are more miatas on the road than any other roadster, guess there are a lot of 'chics' in this country?
now. when does the sky go on sale? thinking about trading the s2k in....

the new 1 latch top is just effin BRILLIANT. i believe that falls under the interior category. there's more leg room, thigh room, shoulder room. the interior plastic is FAR better - dare i saw elegant? - than the stuff used in the '99 and no worse than a base model mazda6 (i sold these cars, i think i'd know).
re: acceleration... uhhh.. if it's no slower than solstice, then how about calling it appropriate for the class? mazda3s are no faster.. this whole point is moot as the car, since '89, has NEVER been about pure acceleration. you have never, willl never, see one single marketing point mentioning how quick this car is in a straight line vs. *****
re: "chick car" whatever. solstice can be considered a chic car, as can most 2 seat roadsters. there are more miatas on the road than any other roadster, guess there are a lot of 'chics' in this country?
now. when does the sky go on sale? thinking about trading the s2k in....
Well, I am not suprised that there is more leg room/thigh room, shoulder room. Its a bigger car than the older model. I would still consider the interior of the Mazda 6 superior to the interior of the mx-5.
I would say that its acceleration is appropriate for those that enjoy it for what it is. A cheap weekend roadster. Obviously as far as acceleration is concerned, its not going to hang with the 350z/s2000/boxster crowd. But I would like a roadster than can at least edge out a Corrolla S...or for that matter a small ute like the Rav4..
Still a chick car.. you can call it whatever you want, but i think most people would agree, its still a chick car..
Originally Posted by Anrosphynx,Feb 14 2006, 01:03 AM
Still a chick car.. you can call it whatever you want, but i think most people would agree, its still a chick car..
Originally Posted by mav,Feb 13 2006, 11:28 AM
Who is buying them you ask? People that can't afford a S2000 and too stupid to know that the new MX-5 (Miata) is a much better car.




