Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Solstice

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #21  
Suzukaboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Anrosphynx,Feb 13 2006, 10:17 AM]Not making a dent? are you nuts? Did you not read your original post before you posted? Average lot time is 15 days. Most stealerships can't even get them onto the lot before they sell.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #22  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by speed_bump,Feb 13 2006, 12:02 PM
Porsche engines won the F1 championship in 84 and 85 under the name TAG Turbos and Audi won many a grand prix back when they were still called Auto Union.
Yes, you are correct it was Tag/Porsche. I don't recall but I thought Porsche was not the main designer of that motor. I thought they were brought in for their turbo experience. Auto Union would be a bit of a stretch because they aren't exactly the same company as Audi. The roots are there but the actual history is a bit muddy thanks to WWII and the iron curtain. I believe most of the Auto Union stuff ended up in the east. I'm not sure how much of what became Audi was actually carried over from pre WWII.
Either way it's a stupid way to choose which car to buy.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #23  
speed_bump's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 24,687
Likes: 195
From: MoCo
Default

Originally Posted by rockville,Feb 13 2006, 03:35 PM
Either way it's a stupid way to choose which car to buy.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #24  
Anrosphynx's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, California
Default

Originally Posted by Suzukaboy,Feb 13 2006, 12:30 PM
I wouldn't call 1200 cars (15.8% of 7435) much of a dent in the 16-36 age market. If they're not concerned, why the Ludacris ad? Surely that ad was not aimed at the 36+age group which purchased about 6250 cars during the same period.

As far as price gouging dealers, price one out on the web and you'll see that the average selling price of $25,194 is about what what you would expect given the list of options available. The sales pace is brisk but the dealers, on average, are not getting much, if any, above MSRP.

Remember when the new Tbird came out? Dealers were getting thousands over MSRP. When those intial buyers bought however there was no one behind them and the car was eventually cancelled.

GM can't afford to let that happen to Solstice so they must broaden the market appeal of the car beyond the usual people who buy GM cars. There is a whole generation of younger people who don't even think about GM cars and GM needs to get them to at least check the Solstice out. They won't steal many sales from Miata and others if only the good old boys are looking.

Actually I hope they make it. Competition keeps everyone on their toes.
Yeah, I am sure you got it... GM is sooo concerned about an 18 year old buying the solstice and that it wouldn't sell that they went out and hired Ludacris. They are SO desperate... Common, did you even convince yourself with that statement?.

The average selling price is 25k+ for the car with options, not including dealer mark up, taxes, title, ect. Dealer markup is never included in the average price. I don't know where you live, but here they are marking them up 5k, and they still can't keep them on the showroom floor.

I would call 16 percent a dent especially seeing the limited availability of the car, and the fact that many buyers put down money many many months before the car was released. How many 18 year olds do you know that would plunk down 5k and wait a year before they would actually get the car? Now does the demographics make a little more sense?

GM will have no problems selling this car. And they WILL take sales from the miata. How many hardcore "BUY AMERICAN" individuals have been waiting for a product that was in the miata class? Until now, neither Ford nor GM has produced such a product. Now they have a product they can get behind, and a price they can afford.

I am not going to say that it is a superior product, I am just saying, don't knock it, because it was a good choice by GM and they will sell very well. I have no worries, no matter how people bash on it.

Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 01:43 PM
  #25  
aklucsarits's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by rockville,Feb 12 2006, 05:02 PM
I would be curious what percent traded in Firebirds. 50% would indicate something much different than say 2% with all other models each being less than 2% trade in.
That's a good point. The article's claim on trade-ins is pretty vague.

I certainly don't think it's surprising that the Firebird is the leading trade in candidate though. Pontiac as a brand still has a rich hertitage and strong brand loyalty among its core fans. This is the first sporty car Pontiac has offered since the Firebird was last offered in the 2002 model year. So it stands to reason that the Pontiac fans would be first in line on the preorder and wait lists.

What was the leading trade in candidate on the 2000 Honda S2000? I'd be willing to bet it was some sporty Honda product - probably a Prelude or an Integra?

It's also not surprising that the main demographic for the first wave was the 35-55 age males. The first adopters of the S2000 fell largely into that same demographic as well. As someone else already pointed out - it's mainly middle-aged males with large disposable incomes who are buying such sportscars as a weekend car.

Andrew
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 02:13 PM
  #26  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

Give that man a cigar! I traded in my Teg GSR to buy the S2000.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #27  
ToeKneeC's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: E LA
Default

Originally Posted by Anrosphynx,Feb 13 2006, 01:53 PM
After driving the MX-5, I think it is debateable that it is a much better car. The interior is kind of crappy for Mazda. Acceleration is lackluster (as it is with the soltice) and styling is still "chick car"...
and these are .. all opinions

the new 1 latch top is just effin BRILLIANT. i believe that falls under the interior category. there's more leg room, thigh room, shoulder room. the interior plastic is FAR better - dare i saw elegant? - than the stuff used in the '99 and no worse than a base model mazda6 (i sold these cars, i think i'd know).

re: acceleration... uhhh.. if it's no slower than solstice, then how about calling it appropriate for the class? mazda3s are no faster.. this whole point is moot as the car, since '89, has NEVER been about pure acceleration. you have never, willl never, see one single marketing point mentioning how quick this car is in a straight line vs. *****

re: "chick car" whatever. solstice can be considered a chic car, as can most 2 seat roadsters. there are more miatas on the road than any other roadster, guess there are a lot of 'chics' in this country?


now. when does the sky go on sale? thinking about trading the s2k in....
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #28  
Anrosphynx's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, California
Default

Originally Posted by ToeKneeC,Feb 13 2006, 03:52 PM
and these are .. all opinions

the new 1 latch top is just effin BRILLIANT. i believe that falls under the interior category. there's more leg room, thigh room, shoulder room. the interior plastic is FAR better - dare i saw elegant? - than the stuff used in the '99 and no worse than a base model mazda6 (i sold these cars, i think i'd know).

re: acceleration... uhhh.. if it's no slower than solstice, then how about calling it appropriate for the class? mazda3s are no faster.. this whole point is moot as the car, since '89, has NEVER been about pure acceleration. you have never, willl never, see one single marketing point mentioning how quick this car is in a straight line vs. *****

re: "chick car" whatever. solstice can be considered a chic car, as can most 2 seat roadsters. there are more miatas on the road than any other roadster, guess there are a lot of 'chics' in this country?


now. when does the sky go on sale? thinking about trading the s2k in....
which is why I said it was debateable...

Well, I am not suprised that there is more leg room/thigh room, shoulder room. Its a bigger car than the older model. I would still consider the interior of the Mazda 6 superior to the interior of the mx-5.

I would say that its acceleration is appropriate for those that enjoy it for what it is. A cheap weekend roadster. Obviously as far as acceleration is concerned, its not going to hang with the 350z/s2000/boxster crowd. But I would like a roadster than can at least edge out a Corrolla S...or for that matter a small ute like the Rav4..

Still a chick car.. you can call it whatever you want, but i think most people would agree, its still a chick car..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #29  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Anrosphynx,Feb 14 2006, 01:03 AM
Still a chick car.. you can call it whatever you want, but i think most people would agree, its still a chick car..
Dude, go easy on chicks. I would call it more of a hairdressers car!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 07:00 PM
  #30  
jimbogxp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mav,Feb 13 2006, 11:28 AM
Who is buying them you ask? People that can't afford a S2000 and too stupid to know that the new MX-5 (Miata) is a much better car.
So tell me all about your test drive in a Solstice. What made the MX-5 you drove so much better?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 AM.