sti vs. c5 (non Z06) which would win?
05-11-2004, 02:53 PM
#31
Registered User
I figure I'm a Joe-average racer and I get 12.6's to 12.8's in my stock Z06 at Carlsbad Raceway, the fastest local venue. Drag radials and a better driver nails 12.0's and rare 11.9's at the same time & place (heh, I have in-car video with him kicking my @ss in the other lane).
I can't say squat about base C5 times but 114+ MPH on stock tires smells bad to me.
I can't say squat about base C5 times but 114+ MPH on stock tires smells bad to me.
05-12-2004, 06:58 AM
#32
I agree with Penforhire, the stock Goodyear runflats on the the regular C5 SUCK BAD. Swap out for good non runflats and you pick up a better ride, better handling, better grip, everything.
114mph bone stock on a regular C5 would be a big freak, but within the realm of possibility, most newer regular C5 six-speeds are in the 110ish range bone stock.
114mph bone stock on a regular C5 would be a big freak, but within the realm of possibility, most newer regular C5 six-speeds are in the 110ish range bone stock.
05-12-2004, 07:36 AM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 7,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by QUIKAG
114mph bone stock on a regular C5 would be a big freak, but within the realm of possibility, most newer regular C5 six-speeds are in the 110ish range bone stock.
114mph bone stock on a regular C5 would be a big freak, but within the realm of possibility, most newer regular C5 six-speeds are in the 110ish range bone stock.
s out there...it happens. I have seen a bone stock 954 trap 145mph last year...which was absolutely unheard of!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2kturkey
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
20
11-17-2001 11:28 PM