The UGLIEST CAR of 2010
04-01-2011, 09:04 PM
#61
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1 All Mazda 3s look awful, but the flagship must take the punishment. I was seriously considering trading in my 06 Rabbit for this car as my daily driver, but I couldn't get over that horrific front end. Such a great performer with so much practicality. Ashame they ruined it with the re-design. Please change your front ends Mazda!!!!!
04-02-2011, 02:41 PM
#62
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm gonna go ahead and go with a classic ugly. 2010 PT Cruiser, http://www.chrysler.com/en/2010/pt_cruiser/gallery/ .
Not only is it dated as hell looking, but you can tell how cheap it is just by looking at it. That's a win-win for me.
[img]...[/img]
[img]...[/img]
Chrystler really does know how to make the ugliest interiors.
Not only is it dated as hell looking, but you can tell how cheap it is just by looking at it. That's a win-win for me.
[img]...[/img]
[img]...[/img]
Chrystler really does know how to make the ugliest interiors.
I don't think the interior is that bad compared to some of the other cars in the same price range. Nobody does cheap interior like Toyota, IMHO. Looks nice in pictures, but you really don't want to sit in one.
04-05-2011, 06:20 AM
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I will admit the styling is a bit questionable, but there is way more to it than that
Nissan and Honda exist IN THE SAME WORLD ECONOMY, the challenges Honda faces ARE THE SAME ONES that that Nissan faces
Honda has retreated into its shell like a turtle, or more like an Ostrich with its head shoved in the sand, Nissan on the other hand continues to reach out and take risks and I respect them deeply for that
Honda = Fail, Nissan = Win
Engine Type: Gas Turbocharged I4
Displacement: 1.6L
Valve timing: Variable
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM: 188 @ 5600
SAE Net Torque @ RPM: 177 @ 2000
Transmission: continuously variable-speed automatic
Curb weight: 2959 lbs.
Some may like the look, others may not, but to me the key is Nissan has put together a fun, risky, performance based tiny crossover and I sort of like it just because it is so unusual
04-05-2011, 10:45 AM
#65
I actually really like this car
I'd never buy it even if I could afford it (doesn't fit my personality), but I think it looks good and always gets my attention. These things are all over Manhattan though. It's definitely got presence and is unique. See it in real life and you may possibly change your mind (I'm also the oddball that *likes* the TL but still prefer the previous gen Type-S)[/quote]
I've seen them in person. I still find it hideous from the c-pillar back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post