Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Why I bought an S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #11  
JLB's Avatar
JLB
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Default

Originally Posted by y2ks2k,Aug 13 2005, 03:06 PM
No matter what you say JLB The Troll, my E-Penis is still larger then yours. I mean.. thats what your here for really... right? See.. you've lost now so you can leave...
Nice ad hom.

You are the troll, not me.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #12  
Planets's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Bend, OR
Default

sigh.. here we go again
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #13  
JLB's Avatar
JLB
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Default

Originally Posted by eyescream,Aug 13 2005, 03:44 PM
I hope you are kidding...
No, just facts.

Less parts, and more horsepower per liter than any production car in the world.

Tell me where I'm wrong.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #14  
JLB's Avatar
JLB
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Default

[QUOTE=i_heart_my_DB8,Aug 13 2005, 04:04 PM]

Hey JBL:

First of all, your adding all those copied and pasted auto-x results really makes this thread difficult to read, and were not necessary.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #15  
JLB's Avatar
JLB
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Default

Originally Posted by undertow,Aug 13 2005, 04:10 PM
JLB, I am being honest when I say this; your behavior on this board is unhealthy. There's a difference between being proud of your car and being obsessed with tearing down other cars around you.

It's great that you're happy with your car. Go drive it and have fun and stop worrying about what others think about you and your car.
I'm talking about the RX-8 here, not my car.

Learn the difference.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:47 PM
  #16  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

Originally Posted by JLB,Aug 13 2005, 01:36 PM
No, just facts.

Less parts, and more horsepower per liter than any production car in the world.

Tell me where I'm wrong.
I'll tell you where you're wrong.

It is simpleton to compare HP/L ratios between two fundamentally different types of internal combustion engines. While technically the RX-8's rotary displaces 1.3L, it also requires all 1.3L of combustion FOR EVERY ONE ROTATION. Whereas a traditional piston based engine requres TWO FULL REVOLUTIONS to expel its full displacement.

Weren't you wondering why the fuel efficiency of the RX-8 is much more similar to a 2.6L engine than a 1.3?

Ahhh, but we digress. The RX-8 has no effect on my choice to buy an S2000 over a Miata
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #17  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

You said you bought your car because of it's racing heritage, when comparing it to a Mazda.
No. I said when comparing it to a MIATA. All Miatas are Mazdas. Not all Mazdas are Miatas. Got that? Also, please point out to me where I used the word "heritage."

[QUOTE]Are you blind?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #18  
JLB's Avatar
JLB
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Default

Originally Posted by rogerio1234,Aug 13 2005, 04:19 PM
What?!?

You must be joking.

How many times a Mazda won a race in F1?
F1 banned the use of rotary engines in 1982 after Mazda dominated LeMans, so we will never know.


The Wankel rotary engine was banned along with the Gas Turbine, Diesel, Sarich Orbital, and any engine type other than the Internal Combustion Engine as part of the 1982 Concorde Agreement between the teams and the FIA, which also banned four wheel drive. The only use of the Wankel rotary in recent time in motorsport has been in Mazda Sports Cars and Touring Cars. A 14D powered Mazda 787B won Le Mans in an upset first Japanese win in 1991, snatching victory from the 7 litre Jaguar XJR-12 horde.

http://www.atlasf1.com/2000/bra/faq.html

I hope you are all learning today.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #19  
CARNUTMAMA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

When I first saw the Miata, I drooled over it. It reminded me of the MGmidget I had as a kid. I wanted that Miata, but I was a single mom of an 9 year old and a 6 year old; I could only afford one car. Over the years I kept looking at the Miatas, noting how nice they looked even when they were 10 years old and getting rides in them and reading about them. My plan was to buy one when my youngest went off to college.

Maybe the long anticipation caused a bit of overbuilt expectations. When I test drove the new Miata speed last summer, I was a bit disappointed. So a began checking out other cars. Nine months later, I test drove the S2000. I bought it the same night. I've had my S for 7 months now and I'm obsessed. The S is the perfect car for me. But I'll always have a soft spot for the Miata that I never owned.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #20  
JLB's Avatar
JLB
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Default

Originally Posted by i_heart_my_DB8,Aug 13 2005, 04:47 PM
I'll tell you where you're wrong.

It is simpleton to compare HP/L ratios between two fundamentally different types of internal combustion engines. While technically the RX-8's rotary displaces 1.3L, it also requires all 1.3L of combustion FOR EVERY ONE ROTATION. Whereas a traditional piston based engine requres TWO FULL REVOLUTIONS to expel its full displacement.

Weren't you wondering why the fuel efficiency of the RX-8 is much more similar to a 2.6L engine than a 1.3?

Ahhh, but we digress. The RX-8 has no effect on my choice to buy an S2000 over a Miata
So you are saying the RX-8 engine is not the most powerful per liter in the production car world?

You had better call Car and Driver, Motor Trend, and Road and Track with your amazing insight.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 AM.