Am I insane?
Originally Posted by martin j,Aug 10 2008, 09:44 AM
Danny, by the time the car's available you'll have seen 10 different others that you fancy. 

Originally Posted by C7 JFW,Aug 10 2008, 09:57 PM
Why have a lotus when you can have a GT-R for not a lot more. The lotus pales into comparison for me.
I was dreaming about an Alfa Spyder restoration this morning. Now I don't think that could keep up with a GT-R
Up here, straight line turbo nutjob power is irrelevant steering feel and handling characteristics are far more important. That's not to say the GTR wont handle, it will but without the same connection you get in a Lotus and that's really important to me.
It isn't always about going as fast as you possibly can
.
Also I think the Lotus looks more special.
It isn't always about going as fast as you possibly can
.Also I think the Lotus looks more special.
Originally Posted by Hypersonik,Aug 7 2008, 06:12 PM
The 996 had 285bhp, weighed about 1350kg and was REAR engined.
You can't get better for off the line traction (bar 4wd), yet this still couldn't break the 5 second barrier.
Whilst 1350 is certainly not light, it's not 'heavy' either.
You can't get better for off the line traction (bar 4wd), yet this still couldn't break the 5 second barrier.
Whilst 1350 is certainly not light, it's not 'heavy' either.
the lowest bhp you can get in a 996 is 297, I should know
Originally Posted by MB,Aug 12 2008, 05:40 PM
297 Jamie??
Oh dear, isn't that less than a Boxter S?
It did feel rather pokey when you took me out in it though!
Oh dear, isn't that less than a Boxter S?

It did feel rather pokey when you took me out in it though!


Boxster S is 252, 280 or 295 bhp depending on what year.







