Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Bugger - 3 points on the licence... (rant content)

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #31  
m1bjr's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,445
Likes: 7
From: Plymouth
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by stormcloud,Apr 2 2007, 10:20 PM
It highlights how the road law has not kept pace with the safety and handling of modern cars
You are trolling right?

More children on bikes; more animals; more slow moving vehicles and plant; poorer quality roads; more pedestrians and pedestrian crossings; greater
volume of traffic...

There is a hell of a lot more to concentrate upon when driving today, than
there was ten years ago.
So, hardly surprising we are seeing a drive for slower speeds now.
It has little to do with how great your car is, only how poor the average driver is.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 11:10 PM
  #32  
dreamer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,493
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

And an easy win for politicians.

They've fooled the population into thinking slow = safe (as demonstrated by a lot of people around here who drive at 20-30mph in NSL's and flash their lights if you dare to overtake them without breaking the speed limit).

Slow is NOT safe necessarily. Fast is NOT necessarily dangerous.

However its an easy win for the politicians so more and more slow speed limits creep in.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #33  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

cars are more capable
drivers aren't
inappropriate speed results in many accidents
'inappropriate' usually means too high not too low
in the overwheming majority of cases, it is simplicity itself to drive about within speed limits
but this is often rather dull......
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:50 AM
  #34  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Apr 3 2007, 09:18 AM
cars are more capable
drivers aren't
inappropriate speed results in many accidents
'inappropriate' usually means too high not too low
in the overwheming majority of cases, it is simplicity itself to drive about within speed limits
but this is often rather dull......
I drive within speed limits on anything up to 50mph roads (if I exceed the limits , I'm aware that it's my choice and I accept the penalty should I get nicked). Yes, it is quite dull, but it's not that hard, remember, one has to be able to do it to pass the test.

Given the shocking standards of driving which caused mainly by attitudes rather than by a lack of skill, it's probably a good thing that the majority are being slowed down.

It's a shame that brilliant drivers such as me have to obey the limits set for the majority...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 01:28 AM
  #35  
stormcloud's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Default

Schools and Hospitals for example are plain and simple, you do not drive above the speed limit set (whatever that may be).

Ultimately the main comments from all this are correct, standards of driving by a lot of drivers I see are poor, and the lowest common denominator is the idiot driver in the rust bucket who has no insurance or MOT anyway. We all have to drive within the limit as the road system in place is nowhere near granular enough to calculate who is a great, good, poor or idiot driver.

If the police officer had said "look, I know that you can drive safely at above 70mph but everyone has to obey the same limit as we cannot guess who is and is not a safe driver" then I would have appretiated it a lot more than the boy racer look he gave me.

Sad really, need to book a trackday or buy a smart car and put a goverment black box in it.


Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #36  
Moggy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,541
Likes: 0
From: omnipresent
Default

Think the issue should be more with the use of police resources in your case.

I agree with other comments about occup. hazard.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #37  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by dreamer,Apr 2 2007, 07:07 AM
Pisses me off too.

We just got the local Tory newsletter (polling day coming up in May) and he's going on about lowering all the speed limits and strictly enforcing them to make our roads safer.

Excuse me- if the roads aren't safe perhaps we should look at why, and make them safer (visibility, crossings, lights, etc. etc.), rather than just blindly reducing speed limits.

I mean if the crashes are because people are speeding then the current speed limit isn't the problem (i.e. it's not because people crash while they are doing the speed limits).

Slow does NOT equal Safe !
Exactly.

And we get a Tory getting off on the ignorance/brainwashedness of the battery-thinkers.

A14; newish D/C, low traffic density. Ideal place to rape money out of people.

The motorised prams HATE it when they put a talivan near a school, 'cos they all get done!

Like John say, it was only 94 (my speedos are surprisingly accurate around that speed!) and it could have been a LOT worse.

It's probably less stress than being turned over for your mobile phone too (although you are allowed to maim the perpetrators in that instance).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Saki GT
Car and Bike Talk
12
Aug 23, 2014 06:49 PM
Xd
Car Talk - Non S2000
43
Feb 10, 2008 07:34 AM
BleachS2k
Car Talk - Non S2000
7
May 15, 2007 10:37 AM
unclebob
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
1
Jul 1, 2005 04:37 PM
Ade
UK & Ireland Meets & Events - Past
46
Aug 25, 2003 06:54 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:49 AM.