Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Civic type R or Cooper S?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 06:18 AM
  #31  
N8ORTS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: England
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves,Jul 17 2006, 06:04 AM


The DC5 is wonderfully hardcore, possibly too hardcore for some.

CTR is softer, but too powerful for the front wheels. Shreds tyres & then is crap to drive.

Minis - basically great, but some wheel/tyre combos will ruin its dynamics. Typical Krautwagen, then.

I do wonder if the Cooper might be a better buy, therefore.

But you will look like an estate agent.

All in all, an Impreza has far better dynamics & is cheaper.
If you've owned the CTR for some time then your above comments would be alot different i think.

My front tyres didn't need changing until 13k miles and the rears were still fine so they hardly 'shred' the tyres.

If you know how to use the throttle correctly then it's far from 'too powerful' for the fronts.

The CTR is much easier to drive fast than S2K also which is a plus. Also much more controllable in the wet.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 06:21 AM
  #32  
RedUn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,699
Likes: 1
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by Nottm_S2,Jul 17 2006, 03:07 PM
forget them both. chav or gay, gad is spot on.
get the new Golf Gti and be a badge monkey instead
wot u mean is buy an A3 2.0 turbo quattro and then turn the boost up

plus they look nice, are well built and would be a very sublte but very capable car
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 06:23 AM
  #33  
RedUn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,699
Likes: 1
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by N8ORTS,Jul 17 2006, 03:18 PM
If you've owned the CTR for some time then your above comments would be alot different i think.

My front tyres didn't need changing until 13k miles and the rears were still fine so they hardly 'shred' the tyres.

If you know how to use the throttle correctly then it's far from 'too powerful' for the fronts.

The CTR is much easier to drive fast than S2K also which is a plus. Also much more controllable in the wet.


finally some one who can drive!

people need to learn that just because a car is front wheel drive the throttle doesn't instantly become an on-off switch
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 06:30 AM
  #34  
Xd's Avatar
Xd
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,497
Likes: 0
From: Hatfield
Default

Nick. Ability to drive
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #35  
moff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,467
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
Default

I have driven both, the CTR extensively and on a track.

The CTR is faster (against a stock Cooper S) and far more practical.

The Mini has amazing handling, better interior and much better residuals, better image too.

Personally I would go for a Mini Cooper S Works, a cracking little car and has the same performance as the CTR.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #36  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by RedUn,Jul 17 2006, 03:23 PM
people need to learn that just because a car is front wheel drive the throttle doesn't instantly become an on-off switch
It needn't be. But invariably is.

But if you have a topheavy fraction with wobbly McPherson struts, it tends to be.

It makes the car a real chore to drive in the wet, with its exaggerated weight transference and the front wheels trying to do the steering and power delivery.

The car has minimal RWS characteristics too, so does not throttle steer anywhere near as well as the old EK4/DC2 models.

Some are evidently capable of only concentrating on one pair of wheels at a time, (like the president who couldn't walk & chew gum) so obviously find it easier in the wet than the far more balanced & enjoyable S2000.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #37  
havoc UK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: Coventry
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves,Jul 17 2006, 06:04 AM
The DC5 is wonderfully hardcore, possibly too hardcore for some.
Including Brit B-roads.

On smooth tarmac, it just needs more steering feel and a livelier back-end.

On typical brit tarmac, it's a nightmare of camber-hunting, tramlining, torque-steer and generally acts far more ill-mannered than a DC2.

Half of it may be down to not 'feeling' it early enough...but isn't that a point in itself?!? Didn't like it, didn't rate it as a fun 'give-and-take' car.


My advice would be go for the Mini - if you already have an S, you might want a car with a different character as an alternative...and FI will give you that.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:57 PM
  #38  
S2ThouDriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Sale
Default

Had an 02 plate CTR, low mileage, like brand new. Nice looking car, seats are ok but not as supportive as you might think, gearbox very similar to the S2000 (very good), but....

Anything less than bone dry on the roads and all it does is spin like crazy if you need to go anywhere fast, even controlled throttle will spin the wheels in VTEC.
The brakes are terrible. For a car with so 200bhp, the brakes really should be better.
The steering felt like it wasn't connected to the car, very numb, very unimpressed.
Also, Blaring engine note at 70-80mph, my S2000 is quieter.

having said that, they seem to have addressed some of these issues from 04 onwards..you can get one with the better Recaros (as seen in the Accord Type R), the steering has been done differently and has had better reviews. To be honest, i am considering an 04 one for the winter. Even with its critisisms, its bulletproof, looks good, is reliable etc etc

Mini... well, can't comment really, although i know a few people who have them and they swear by them. They get good reviews too and sometimes beat the CTR in them so must be pretty good.

Thought i'd put my 2p in, hope it helps?

Rob
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 05:03 AM
  #39  
S2 Dee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Waiting to move
Default

The mini is not bad to drive; I bought a Cooper S before the S2. The service from the dealership was utter rubbish, as was the factories ability to follow an options list. They messed me around, the car was delivered late, with the wrong interior! I refused to even sit in the damn thing, the dealer principle was too busy to talk to me, BMW / Mini UK, offered to provide a new car but with a four month wait and me paying the extra as it would be a new model year! As the dealership had already sold my trade in I would have to go with out a car during the wait to boot. (The BL work ethic / attitude lives on, how retro is that?)
The only reason I bought the thing was because of its good residual values. I then went for option two the CTR, at the dealers I was unfortunately given the option of a go in a S2000, the rest as they say is history.
As a driving experience I think the CTR is better than the Mini, especially if it the Mini has the 17” run flat wheels, they destroy the ride. The dealer / manufacturer experience is pants, I would never buy a BMW group product again!


Dee
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 05:36 AM
  #40  
RedUn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,699
Likes: 1
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by S2ThouDriver,Jul 18 2006, 08:57 AM
The brakes are terrible. For a car with so 200bhp, the brakes really should be better.
I thought the brakes were identical to the S's brakes?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.