Exige S update...
Just as I started it and saw Gaz and Kelk and BW get them I thought, fack, I would go that route now.
I will get one though. They look like they are made of shit and the ones I've sat in feel like a canoe upturned on a rollerskate, but I don't really care as long as it goes like shit off a shovel.
I will get one though. They look like they are made of shit and the ones I've sat in feel like a canoe upturned on a rollerskate, but I don't really care as long as it goes like shit off a shovel.
I think it's actually better screwed together than most cars i've owned. I love the interior 
But it would be odd if it was nice and fancy inside - it's part of the occasion of driving it.
And as you say, when you are clinging on for grim death and laughing your head off, you don't really care either way
(2 gramatical errors above, starting a sentence with "and" or "but")
That one you linked is well priced.
I'm pondering over an 08 Super Sport for the future. Those AP brakes, forged wheels and few other tweaks are calling me

But it would be odd if it was nice and fancy inside - it's part of the occasion of driving it.
And as you say, when you are clinging on for grim death and laughing your head off, you don't really care either way

(2 gramatical errors above, starting a sentence with "and" or "but")
That one you linked is well priced.
I'm pondering over an 08 Super Sport for the future. Those AP brakes, forged wheels and few other tweaks are calling me
Originally Posted by MB,Sep 23 2008, 09:26 PM
The 240R version has a recorded 0-60 in 3.9 and 100 in 9.8 so mine is up there with those sort of figures, and I prob have 250-260 bhp.
that is a proper quick car then.
Originally Posted by MB,Sep 23 2008, 09:32 PM
Interesting. I was always taught it was against ze rules!
But who is to say what is a rule?
It's not like a law of nature or science, is it?
Dear Sir<>Yours faithfully and the named salutation<>Yours sincerely is another convention
But in that case, so well established and convenient, that it's not worth challenging
Back o/t, the quoted figures for the Lotus are impressive - but there is a low five second time 0-60 quoted for the S2000 too (from Autocar iirc)
We all know that that such a figure is almost impossible to achieve consistently, if at all, and that achieving it would do the clutch no favours
Are your quoted times for the Lotus 'best times', averages or what?
And how accessible is the ultimate performance (whatever the figures)?
Originally Posted by cheshire_carper,Sep 23 2008, 09:49 PM
I will get one though. They look like they are made of shit and the ones I've sat in feel like a canoe upturned on a rollerskate, but I don't really care as long as it goes like shit off a shovel.
Originally Posted by gaddafi,Sep 23 2008, 10:48 PM
Back o/t, the quoted figures for the Lotus are impressive - but there is a low five second time 0-60 quoted for the S2000 too (from Autocar iirc)
We all know that that such a figure is almost impossible to achieve consistently, if at all, and that achieving it would do the clutch no favours
Are your quoted times for the Lotus 'best times', averages or what?
And how accessible is the ultimate performance (whatever the figures)?

We all know that that such a figure is almost impossible to achieve consistently, if at all, and that achieving it would do the clutch no favours
Are your quoted times for the Lotus 'best times', averages or what?
And how accessible is the ultimate performance (whatever the figures)?

It's the entry to corners that astonishes most people. The lack of weight means you really can demolish huge gaps to the car in front on entry to something like a sharp corner or roundabout.




