Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

F1 Germany

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 01:32 PM
  #81  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,Jul 27 2010, 09:24 PM
It's a fact relevant to the discussion.
Whether Ferrari missed out for one year or two is about as relevant to the conspiracy theory as the colour of Hamilton's helmet.


Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 04:15 AM
  #82  
lovegroova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Good article on this by Brian Moore

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/motorspor...orry-state.html

Were the above words a team order, illegal under F1 rules, or mere observations which left Felipe Massa free to decide whether he should allow team-mate Fernando Alonso to pass and thereby win last weekend’s German Grand Prix?

Is there any serious dispute that can be had over this? The use of the word “sorry” necessarily presupposes that the order to allow the pass will be effective and cannot be explained any other way to anyone.

The reasons cited to support the view that it does not matter are firstly that it is a silly rule and secondly, it is broken on many occasions.

Such observations were not ones which anyone thought sufficient to exculpate Dean Richards during ‘Bloodgate’, even though both could have been claimed with equal force. It is only when applied to a different set of known sporting facts that the flaws in such reasoning are fully exposed.

The extra insult comes because of the gibberish now being spouted by Ferrari and others to suggest that black is in fact white. To many avid F1 fans the controversy over this incident and subsequent $100,000 (£64,500) instant fine for the Ferrari team is frivolous bagatelle, something whipped up by a rabid media.

The fuss is actually about illegality. Whether those in the know, looking from what they see as a position of knowledge, believe the rule to be nonsense is not the point; it was introduced after Ferrari’s manipulation of the Austrian GP in 2002 had brought opprobrium on F1 and remains valid until repealed.

Participants cannot select which rules they wish to adhere to or else anarchy ensues. What is to stop teams taking Ferrari’s lead and breaking the ban on in-season testing, something that no lesser figure than Michael Schumacher has called similarly ridiculous?

Regarding the decision and incident itself: the utter drivel being proffered by way of explanation is revealed by looking at the event logically.

If Alonso was faster, and there was very little evidence that this was significant, he could have overtaken Massa anyway. Further, since the furore there have been contradictory accounts of why Massa made the decision, including the risible claim that the passing manoeuvre happened because “Massa made a small mistake when shifting up three gears at once”. If this was a freely made decision there would only have been one reason given, not several.

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo has tried to deflect flak by attacking his detractors, saying: “Enough of the hypocrisy. This has always happened. If one races for Ferrari, then the interests of the team come before those of the individual.”

Perhaps he has forgotten the fit of moral outrage shown by his leading driver only a few weeks ago when Alonso attacked the Valencia stewards for what he called manipulating the result.

Without a shred of consideration for how Massa might feel, Alonso is now lauding his win, saying it was a “great feeling” and that “all wins are special” – well only if you are not a real sportsman. If you know you haven’t earned it you shut up and move on.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 04:28 AM
  #83  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,Jul 29 2010, 12:15 PM
or, in rather fewer words

how about considering that Ferrari broke a rule that just about everyone knows is unenforcable and a bit daft

hot news:

some rules are more important than others!

and the fine reflects that
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 08:29 AM
  #84  
lovegroova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

The fine is the maximum punishment available to the stewards, so the WMSC "court" referral is of more import.

It's quite similar to, though not of the same degree, as the Hamilton/McLaren lying scenario.

I can tell you Alonso's line already:

I was not aware that Massa had been told to let me pass, I thought he had a problem. My "this is ridiculous" comment was aimed at the back-markers.
It's a matter of "wait and see" now.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 08:49 AM
  #85  
(S2K4ME)'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Tring
Default

What annoys me is that the likes of Alonso etc are saying it was done "for the good of Scuderia / Ferrari team"

If that's the case then it doesn't matter who was 1 & 2 as the point totals will be exactly the same for their "Scuderia" constructor tally!

I really hate what happened on Sunday and will be very dissappointed if the FIA don't dock them points! However it won't surprise me because Jean Todt is now in charge

Funny thing is I've just played golf today and I'm sat in my Ferrari polo shirt and old Tag watch
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 09:16 AM
  #86  
san2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 0
From: SE VTecville
Default

Originally Posted by (S2K4ME),Jul 29 2010, 04:49 PM
What annoys me is that the likes of Alonso etc are saying it was done "for the good of Scuderia / Ferrari team"
This is the I don't get.

If teams apparently only care about the constructors' championship, what would it have mattered which way around they finished?

The drivers' championship is, always has been, and always will be most important, because this is what grabs the headlines.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 10:35 AM
  #87  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by san2000,Jul 29 2010, 06:16 PM
The drivers' championship is, always has been, and always will be most important, because this is what grabs the headlines.
with that, I have never cared about who wins the constructors.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #88  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

Originally Posted by san2000,Jul 29 2010, 05:16 PM
This is the I don't get.

If teams apparently only care about the constructors' championship, what would it have mattered which way around they finished?

The drivers' championship is, always has been, and always will be most important, because this is what grabs the headlines.
Indeed. There's a lot of prestige for the team and the sponsors in winning the driver's championship. But I can't understand why Ferrari, Fiat, the sponsors, or even Fernando Alonso himself wants to win the championship this way.

If Alonso ends up winning the driver's championship by a couple of points (unlikely I know), will it be because he was the best driver over the year? No, it'll be because he had a more helpful teammate than whoever might end up as second.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #89  
gbduo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,848
Likes: 0
From: Southampton/Reading
Default

Ah well, what is done is done, Hungary now, lets see what happens in this race and wait for the results of the WMSC...

Lets hope it starts better for McLaren and Red Bull tomorrow!
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 01:08 PM
  #90  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by Dembo,Jul 29 2010, 08:05 PM
Indeed. There's a lot of prestige for the team and the sponsors in winning the driver's championship. But I can't understand why Ferrari, Fiat, the sponsors, or even Fernando Alonso himself wants to win the championship this way.

If Alonso ends up winning the driver's championship by a couple of points (unlikely I know), will it be because he was the best driver over the year? No, it'll be because he had a more helpful teammate than whoever might end up as second.
I was thinking about this, and it might not be so unlikely, the Ferrari is quick, probably as quick as the red bull now, Alonso though it pains me to say it is a very quick driver and will get the nod everytime now in front of his team mate, this will be an advantage over the other 'racing' drivers (vettel webber, button, hamilton etc) ... if I was a betting man and the odds were good, a bet on Alonso becoming world champ this year might not be a bad flutter ...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:14 PM.