Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The Formula 1 Thread - 2012

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 06:26 AM
  #701  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

So, somewhat dull race, but great result for Hamilton even though Raikonnen probably deserved the win. Grosjean must be scratching his head wondering where his second place went, and similarly Button must be wondering how he went from a strong third to sixth.

What happened at the start?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 06:42 AM
  #702  
chilled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 1
From: sideways with an OWL!
Default

the last 2 pitstops for Button screwed his race after a fantastic pass on Vettel on the first lap.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 06:58 AM
  #703  
MB's Avatar
MB
Member
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 33,838
Likes: 23
From: Sunshine Coast - England UK
Default

I feel like i've just lost several hours of my life.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 07:58 AM
  #704  
martin j's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,434
Likes: 312
From: Dunfermline.
Default

Drifted off to land of nod a few times after the start, not the greatest race this year.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 09:46 AM
  #705  
S2K-Phil's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 1
From: Salisbury - old people's home
Default

Originally Posted by MB
I feel like i've just lost several hours of my life.
At least the BBC highlights version made the race interesting
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 09:48 AM
  #706  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Nearly always a bore fest here, but I thought it was .... ok it was dull.




<sarcasm> Still, great to see the 'red bull illegal engine mapping' hasn't affected Red Bulls pace then huh? </sarcasm>
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 09:58 AM
  #707  
fluffyninja's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,273
Likes: 2
From: Chester
Default

Cars are allowed a dry race engine map and a wet race engine map.
Hamilton always wrecks his rear tyres
Hamilton makes rear tyres last
Has a technical electronic glitch that puts the rain light on.
Often systems are linked to automatically put the car in a given configuration.

Not sure how legal it would be to put a car in wet race configuration in the dry to protect tyres on a track notoriously difficult to overtake on. Not saying he did either. Just saying............
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #708  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by fluffyninja
Cars are allowed a dry race engine map and a wet race engine map.
Hamilton always wrecks his rear tyres
Hamilton makes rear tyres last
Has a technical electronic glitch that puts the rain light on.
Often systems are linked to automatically put the car in a given configuration.

Not sure how legal it would be to put a car in wet race configuration in the dry to protect tyres on a track notoriously difficult to overtake on. Not saying he did either. Just saying............
So your conspiracy theory is that Hamilton won 'illegally' by changing his engine mapping to a wet race engine mapping? I suspect he would have been lucky to gain 10th or 12th place by the end of the race if that was the case.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 11:26 AM
  #709  
fluffyninja's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,273
Likes: 2
From: Chester
Default

http://www.formula1.com/inside_f1/ru.../8699/fia.html

Rule 5.5.4 would imply that doing it would be illegal.

I suspect it would make the throttle profile "softer" on the initial pick up out of a corner to help car control in the wet. Something desireable to protect tyres. You'd still want, i suspect, full power available when on the straights or when tying conditions so ultimately total power output would probably still be available.

What I suggest is total conjecture but it seems unusual that a technical glitch would occur putting a rain configuration setting on (the light) on the same race a driver notorusly hard on his tyres manages to run longer on them than a lot of competitors. It would give you an obvious performance disadvantage but on a track where track position is more vital than outright pace it might be worth a shot. Particularly if you can flip a switch just to go back to the full beans settings.

I'm generally a mclaren and Hamilton fan so I'm not upset he won. It just seemed an oddity in the race
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 11:39 AM
  #710  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by fluffyninja
http://www.formula1....s/8699/fia.html

Rule 5.5.4 would imply that doing it would be illegal.

I suspect it would make the throttle profile "softer" on the initial pick up out of a corner to help car control in the wet. Something desireable to protect tyres. You'd still want, i suspect, full power available when on the straights or when tying conditions so ultimately total power output would probably still be available.

What I suggest is total conjecture but it seems unusual that a technical glitch would occur putting a rain configuration setting on (the light) on the same race a driver notorusly hard on his tyres manages to run longer on them than a lot of competitors. It would give you an obvious performance disadvantage but on a track where track position is more vital than outright pace it might be worth a shot. Particularly if you can flip a switch just to go back to the full beans settings.

I'm generally a mclaren and Hamilton fan so I'm not upset he won. It just seemed an oddity in the race
Except he was matching Kimi's pace in the dry lap for lap ... and Kimi was on it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.