Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

M3s are fast

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-24-2006, 01:52 AM
  #21  
Banned
 
Bada Bing!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 17,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Amuse Boy,Jul 23 2006, 10:59 PM
With a few mods - the S can comfortably hang with a stock e46 M3.
Said mods would need to involve stripping the car of 200kg or adding at least 50bhp. Not sure there are many mods out there for the S that can give that without spending >
Old 07-24-2006, 01:54 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
ski-bum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can concur with the M5 v S2000 battle. I was handed my arse on a plate on Thursday evening. That being said, he didnt pull away from me at the rate I thought he would - and considering the speeds we were doing I would be suprised if he wasnt trying!

It was awesome though and has made it onto my more practical alternative list - in fact I was looking on the PH Classifieds at them this morning and some high milers are starting to dip down to the 10-13K mark.
Old 07-24-2006, 01:57 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Richy123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Even the bmw 330i was quicker than the s2000/350z/rx8 round the gymkhana course on an old best motoring dvd however the s2000 came out top in terms of driver enjoyment.
Old 07-24-2006, 02:03 AM
  #24  

 
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hertford
Posts: 31,212
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I saw an M3 on a trackday, once.

It looked very composed and sounded superb.

I did not get opportunity to drive near it, but it looked like the fastest thing on the track.
Old 07-24-2006, 02:08 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well myself and PJL were slaughtering lots of "better" machinery at the weekend at Donington. It's all very well having a better car but you've got to drive it properly. I was passing 996 GT3's that were on "hot" laps. More like luke warm.

Please, if you're going to get a better car, learn how to drive the fecking thing.
Old 07-24-2006, 02:13 AM
  #26  

 
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hertford
Posts: 31,212
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 56 Posts
Default



IKWYM!

One might think that M3s M5s 911s et all are like M-B 240Ds!
Old 07-24-2006, 02:18 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The GT3 RS's were driven properly though.

Was behind one pulling onto the track, when he nailed it. It was rather nice.
Old 07-24-2006, 02:21 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,790
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chilled,Jul 24 2006, 10:08 AM

Please, if you're going to get a better car, learn how to drive the fecking thing.
why

people buy cars for other reasons than extracting the most performance they can from them

whether it's a footballer's wife in her Aston

or me in my Ferrari

the basic issue in this debate (I thought) was the respective capabilities of two cars

based on the assumption that both cars were standard and that drivers would be equal

good for you that you were able to put inferior drivers 'in their place'

whatever that proves

but I take it you'd concede that a driver of equal ability would have put YOU in your place if the machinery stayed the same?

on the road, you can put Michael Schumacher in his Focus TDi and he will not stand a feckin chance against me in my M5

that's all most people want

Old 07-24-2006, 02:31 AM
  #29  
UK Moderator

 
lovegroova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Herts
Posts: 24,767
Received 300 Likes on 258 Posts
Default

There were a couple of (I'm guessing stock) M3s at Bedford in April and they passed me easily, although not as easily as the 911 turbo that was there!

I was also passed by a few S2000s but it took them a lot longer to catch and pass me, despite the drivers being faster than me (obviously).

In short, the M3 is a much faster car than the S2000, and so it should be, given the power to weight advantage and cost differential.
Old 07-24-2006, 02:48 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This was on the track, it's different on the road. Although I still hold the same opinion.

It's just my point of view. I'll freely admit that part of it is the green eyed monster and it will always annoy me to see a car I can't yet afford not being used to its full ability. Particularly on track.

They may be having as much or more fun driving at 5/10ths as me at 9 or 10 10ths. But I like to see these machines being used to the full.

I personally don't agree with the concept of owning a car for status or prestige. A car to me is either a mode of transport to get from A to B or it's a piece of performance engineering designed to be used to its full potential. This is a very black and white view, but it is mine.


Quick Reply: M3s are fast



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 PM.