Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

More in store for McLaren ?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #1  
Chris Type R's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20,338
Likes: 0
From: North Herts
Default More in store for McLaren ?

"McLaren has been summoned to appear before the FIA's World Motor Sport Council on April 29 to answer charges that it has brought Formula 1 into disrepute over the controversy surrounding Lewis Hamilton's Australian Grand Prix disqualification."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74346

http://allenonf1.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/...c-without-ryan/

http://allenonf1.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/...-leave-mclaren/
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #2  
san2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 0
From: SE VTecville
Default

Oh yes, they're in trouble for sure.

But this is F1.

And they are McLaren.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #3  
R2MUL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Hampshire
Default

They should be banned for the rest of this season and all of next.

Dirty cheats. When will they learn?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #4  
san2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 0
From: SE VTecville
Default

Difficulty is knowing how many knew about it.

I suspect more than just 'Davey' and LH, but perhaps the deed had been done by then.

But I'm sure they could have tried to rectify the situation if they had known, and why wouldn't they have when it was obvious the stewards would find out?

A cock up to say the least.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 10:27 PM
  #5  
rralston's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Default

These are the facts.....

Lewis - you are a liar

Mclaren - clearly a company with a total lack of integrity, who not only lied to get another competitor thrown out, but influenced their own driver to lie to consolidate the advantage

So spying was $100 million, what will blatent cheating get?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 11:16 PM
  #6  
NNervous_R's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Surrey twilight zone
Default

When you read the charges it does look like a boat load of trouble. I had no idea that they had allegedly carried on with the charade (if that is you accept they were wrong from point 1)

The FIA claims that McLaren may have broken the regulations on five counts, that:

* on 29 March, 2009, told the stewards of the Australian Grand Prix that no instructions were given to Hamilton in Car No. 1 to allow Trulli in Car no. 9 to pass when both cars were behind the safety car, knowing this statement to be untrue;

* procured its driver Hamilton the current World Champion, to support and confirm this untrue statement to the stewards;

* although knowing that as a direct result of its untrue statement to the stewards, another driver and a rival team had been unfairly penalised, made no attempt to rectify the situation either by contacting the FIA or otherwise;

* on 2 April, 2009, at a second hearing before the stewards of the Australian Grand Prix, (meeting in Malaysia) made no attempt to correct the untrue statement of 29 March but, on the contrary, continued to maintain that the statement was true, despite being allowed to listen to a recording of the team instructing Hamilton to let Trulli past and despite being given more than one opportunity to correct its false statement;

* on 2 April, 2009, at the second stewards' hearing, procured its driver Hamilton to continue to assert the truth of the false statement given to the stewards on 29 March, while knowing that what he was saying to the stewards was not true.


well you reap what you sow.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #7  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

I can tell you Hamilton's line already

It will be a cross between:

I was only following orders/they didn't tell me the whole truth/I'm leaving that team anyway

Loyalty about to be ditched in favour of self-interest?
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 7, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #8  
ianl's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 4
From: The Beautiful South
Default

Rightly or wrongly, the FIA have said that Lewis is in the clear.

McLaren are up for the the high-jump IMHO.

Penalty - my guess is a shed load of money & turfed out of the Constructors Championship for the season.

Now if this were Ferrari, penalty would be a nice lunch & some fantastic wine the complements of the FIA!
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 11:54 PM
  #9  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

I forgot to add

It's all Ferrari's fault

They made us do it
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 11:59 PM
  #10  
ianl's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 4
From: The Beautiful South
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Apr 7 2009, 11:54 PM
I forgot to add

It's all Ferrari's fault

They made us do it
Precisely!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 AM.