Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

New Type-R

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:05 AM
  #31  
soulcrew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,680
Likes: 0
From: OLD SOUTH WALES
Default

it costs about the same as a mustang gt...0-60 4.5 seconds...fast enough for chesh
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:11 AM
  #32  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,291
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

Chesh has become a ponce

for it's segment it's undoubtedly very quick.. sub 5 is proper quick, tends to mean about 10s 0-100 which 15 years ago was supercar territory

it needs to be better than this the press suggest.. i hope it is but the last one was a truly awful thing imo (i did drive one)

Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:22 AM
  #33  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

Originally Posted by soulcrew
it costs about the same as a mustang gt...0-60 4.5 seconds...fast enough for chesh
We don't all own petrol stations...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:28 AM
  #34  
cheshire_carper's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 29,526
Likes: 4
From: ...by a lake...somewhere
Default

Make it rwd and 4 secs and that would make the press froth
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:29 AM
  #35  
soulcrew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,680
Likes: 0
From: OLD SOUTH WALES
Default

well there is the 4cyl ecoboost version....but only 5.2 seconds 0-60...so rubbish
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:33 AM
  #36  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

Originally Posted by cheshire_carper
Make it rwd and 4 secs and that would make the press froth
Sure and then buy some Wunderwagen instead.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:37 AM
  #37  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by jml
The tradeoff, performance-wise at least, is the torque – its 295lb ft output is over double the previous Civic R’s 142lb ft and produced at 2500rpm, rather than 5600rpm of the old car.
What does that actually mean, though, in terms of performance?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 03:45 AM
  #38  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

Originally Posted by soulcrew
well there is the 4cyl ecoboost version....but only 5.2 seconds 0-60...so rubbish
And let's not forget THIS :

Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 04:11 AM
  #39  
soulcrew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,680
Likes: 0
From: OLD SOUTH WALES
Default

Originally Posted by jml
Originally Posted by soulcrew' timestamp='1425472181' post='23527008
well there is the 4cyl ecoboost version....but only 5.2 seconds 0-60...so rubbish
And let's not forget THIS :


i dont like that
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2015 | 04:30 AM
  #40  
cheshire_carper's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 29,526
Likes: 4
From: ...by a lake...somewhere
Default

Originally Posted by soulcrew
well there is the 4cyl ecoboost version....but only 5.2 seconds 0-60...so rubbish
That's more like it.

Ps I heard one of your motors the other week. Most savage exhaust note I think I have heard.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:37 AM.