Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

A small comparison....

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 02:12 AM
  #21  
Neil.H's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,065
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMomZmMMw1g

Best Motoring hot hatch battle
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 02:47 AM
  #22  
Bada Bing!'s Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,824
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

[QUOTE=Saxo Boy,Sep 20 2006, 01:24 PM] Sorry Neil but that just reads a little like purchase justification

If you are being fair in what you say then the DC5 must be lightyears ahead of the Civic Type-R because my mate has one and we've swapped cars and agreed that on UK (scottish) roads the S2000 is faster, more planted, more fun, stops quicker, doesn't skip about, provides more feedback, etc, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 06:30 AM
  #23  
havoc UK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: Coventry
Default

Originally Posted by Bada Bing!,Sep 23 2006, 02:47 AM
Given a choice between a brand new DC5 in white or a new S2K I would go for the DC5. It's fresher, has none of the weaknesses of the S2K in bad weather, has supposedly far more informative steering, and an engine almost as powerful, and more tunable.

Simon and Neil have driven both and call them a draw, who are we to argue?
Erm, me.

Test-drove both, preferred the S2000.

Steering feel not great in either car - DC5 is 'heavier', but feels more artificial (it's not that good Bada...better than EP3, but that's saying bugger all. Anyone who rates it really needs to drive a Focus (hell, ANY Ford) or a DC2.). S is lighter but more natural. S has more scope for improvement due to fully-adj. double wishbones. DC2 clearly better than both.

Engines - in stock form, DC5 better as 'all-rounder', S2000 better for a blat. Not a massive amount between them.

Handling, dry - S2000 better. On smooth tarmac it's got as much grip and better traction out of corners. On bumpy tarmac it's UK-spec suspension copes much better than the DC5's JDM suspension, which does NOT inspire confidence. Also no torque-steer in S2000. And it's rwd which gives you more options.

Handling, wet - clear DC5 victory, as S2000 needs respect. But DC2 clearly better than both.

Looks - exterior. S2000 for me. Looks more purposeful and coherent. And is much lower.

And they, to me, are the key points. That the S2000 is a soft-top is another advantage - it gives it a whole different character, as it can be driven hard or just cruised in, depending on mood...'cruising' in a 'teg (either one) feels wrong...you just ache to find another NSL to abuse!!!


But if someone wants a moddable everyday car then I can see why the DC5 would appeal.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #24  
Crispy Rice's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
From: Northern Ireland
Default

I think your scoring system should be revised with only 1/2 a point each for All Square, since Europe won the Ryder Cup.

I, like Havoc, would like to buy back a DC2 to complement my S2000. For those who haven't driven one and own an S2000 will feel instanely at home in this car and maybe even have their eyes opened by how exceptionally well it handles.

I totally agree with commets made by Baba about wet weather handling. In the ITR i never really considered the weather conditions, the car went were you pointed it as long as you didn't lift off mid corner (doing so soon becomes a bit of a game in the ITR )

The real frustraion is that i can't go and change my S2000 for a new Honda which costs around 30k, has more than 300bhp, rear wheel drive, fantasic gear box and a 9k rev limit with VTEC delivery....

I really can't understand this as there is defo a market for cars of this type, Nissan 350Z, Alfa Bera, BMW 330 and various other fairly average options.

I admit that I am a bit of a Honda fan, I'm on my third and would buy a fourth but they don't currently make a model for me to "progress" to! I can't afford an NSX and it wouldn't fit in my driveway.

So what do i do? Buy a new s2000 (in white possibly!) ? Supercharge my current car? Buy an ITR and have two cars (and pay insurance on both!) ? Buy a Tamora and a 1.4 Civic (and drive a civic most of the time)?

None of these options are really ideal, I know this thread is about the DC5 in comparison with the s2000 but i think that the fact we are even comparing these cars highlights the gap in the Honda range.

Oh and since i'm ranting the EP3 CTR was a markietng exerise while the DC2 ITR was an engineering one. I feel this is also true of the DC5 ITR highlighted by the fact tha Honda UK didn't bring it to the UK market, for fear of screwing up their Bye Bye GTI campaign.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2006 | 03:46 AM
  #25  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

I understand what you mean.

Then again, if a Brera's as good as it gets, I'd stick with the old Honda.

Fukui has promised us an "easy for people of average skills to drive" sports car, so hopefully it will be a lot less depressing than the Alfa.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blueap2
The S2000 Gallery
32
Dec 11, 2010 08:24 PM
moff
Car Talk - Non S2000
5
Jul 8, 2009 04:11 AM
s2lovely
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
20
Aug 15, 2007 06:51 PM
jdmwhiteboy
S2000 Under The Hood
2
Aug 10, 2002 06:53 PM
Jaysom
S2000 Under The Hood
10
Jul 19, 2002 08:41 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:10 PM.