Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Tee Hee Hee

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:47 AM
  #61  
wadswoaj's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by rahula,Aug 10 2005, 11:20 AM
The funniest one of those options is the short shift gb! Why isn't that standard?
Most people don't bother because the standard gear box is good enough for them..... the only people I know that specced the short shifter have just changed from the S2000 so you can safely assume that the standard issue kit doesn't measure up against the stooks shift......

The S2000 shift is one of the best...... the closest I've come across was in the Suzuki Cappuccino which was as almost good!
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:52 AM
  #62  
MarkB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,979
Likes: 0
From: North Yorks
Default

Originally Posted by Mole,Aug 10 2005, 10:49 AM
crested wheel centres
WTF?

Do they charge extra to put THEIR OWN badges on the wheels? Jeesus.

Or is the heraldic crest of the Mole family?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:08 AM
  #63  
rahula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by wadswoaj,Aug 10 2005, 01:47 PM
Most people don't bother because the standard gear box is good enough for them..... the only people I know that specced the short shifter have just changed from the S2000 so you can safely assume that the standard issue kit doesn't measure up against the stooks shift......
Originally Posted by Mole,Aug 10 2005, 12:40 PM
The throw is already short, it just makes it shorter.
But this is what I fail to understand guys. If Porsche have the know how to make a shorter throw why isn't that standard. Isn't the point of that company to make good cars? It is this fact which confuses me, why make this an option and not standard?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:23 AM
  #64  
wadswoaj's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by rahula,Aug 10 2005, 01:08 PM
But this is what I fail to understand guys. If Porsche have the know how to make a shorter throw why isn't that standard. Isn't the point of that company to make good cars? It is this fact which confuses me, why make this an option and not standard?
Sorry.... missed your point.

The reason its not standard is that the short shift may put off certain people that are less interested in how the car performs.

The short shifter comes with the warning that "some slight resistance may be experienced during gearshifts when the vehicle is started cold"

Of course the main reason is that its another option with which to fleece buyers!

Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:23 AM
  #65  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by rahula,Aug 10 2005, 02:08 PM
But this is what I fail to understand guys. If Porsche have the know how to make a shorter throw why isn't that standard. Isn't the point of that company to make good cars? It is this fact which confuses me, why make this an option and not standard?
According to the option brochure here http://content2.eu.porsche.com/prod/boxste...L_PCGB_MY05.pdf (read if you want a heart attack at the ultimate in pointlessness) the short shifter also leads to 'Significantly increased cold shifting forces' - i.e. It's a bit like an S2000 when cold. I dunno why this would be a problem for Boxster owners given the effort required to operate the pedals?

Of course, the cynic in me would suggest they do it as a way to extract another
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #66  
Subaru2000's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Default

If you want the best, you've got to pay a little bit more
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:37 AM
  #67  
rahula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

[QUOTE=wadswoaj,Aug 10 2005, 10:45 AM] then my company negotiated a
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:46 AM
  #68  
wadswoaj's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by Subaru2000,Aug 10 2005, 01:28 PM
If you want the best, you've got to pay a little bit more
But I can't afford a Ferrari
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 06:03 AM
  #69  
Mole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
From: Nottinghamshire
Default

Originally Posted by MarkB,Aug 10 2005, 12:52 PM
WTF?

Do they charge extra to put THEIR OWN badges on the wheels? Jeesus.

Or is the heraldic crest of the Mole family?
Sarky cnut
The standard ones have the porsche crest in black i think it is. The ones I had are the same colour as the bonnet badge, kind of like haveing you Rick red S logo that some of the s2k owners have or your different coloured honda badge.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 06:20 AM
  #70  
Mole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
From: Nottinghamshire
Default

[QUOTE=lovegroova,Aug 10 2005, 01:23 PM] According to the option brochure here http://content2.eu.porsche.com/prod/boxste...L_PCGB_MY05.pdf (read if you want a heart attack at the ultimate in pointlessness) the short shifter also leads to 'Significantly increased cold shifting forces' - i.e. It's a bit like an S2000 when cold. I dunno why this would be a problem for Boxster owners given the effort required to operate the pedals?

Of course, the cynic in me would suggest they do it as a way to extract another
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 AM.