Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Thinking about an MX5...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:16 AM
  #11  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

The problem with the Rotary is its power shaft sits higher than a crankshaft, meaning the input shaft of the cogbox sits higher.

You'll have to butcher the tranny tunnel and bulkhead, losing the heater and compromising rigidity.

Otherwise everyone would be at it.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:30 AM
  #12  
Polemicist's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves' date='Jan 21 2009, 12:16 PM
The problem with the Rotary is its power shaft sits higher than a crankshaft, meaning the input shaft of the cogbox sits higher.

You'll have to butcher the tranny tunnel and bulkhead, losing the heater and compromising rigidity.
Perhaps not.

Taken from "http://www.fastlane.com.au/Custom_Shed/MX5_rotary.htm":

Let
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:35 AM
  #13  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,296
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

you could get a v8 in that fiat!

v12? i looked at that one, it might have quite poor weight distribution. some of the comments are quite funny.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 05:32 AM
  #14  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

conversion - why not?

RX7 transplant - why on earth that engine?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #15  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Mazda felt it was too refined and expensive for a fun sports car - they tried to engineer the car originall with Dell'Orto style cars, for authenticity.

Not sure a V8 suits an MX-5 either.

Probably the RX-8 Renesis would be a good compromise...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:15 AM
  #16  
MarkB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,979
Likes: 0
From: North Yorks
Default

Or a 2.3 Duratec - same bellhousing pattern IIRC - almost a straight swap*

Would sound lovely on Throttle bodies, 270bhp from Minister (http://www.minister-power.com/duratec/index.htm) - note the POA prices though.....





*Some or all of this statement may be optimistic
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:30 AM
  #17  
Polemicist's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

I've always been interested in a rotary engine for some perverse reason...

I recall reading about a Kennedy Engineering conversion a few years ago - to fit a Mazda rotary to a VW Beetle transaxle. A quick search of t'internet shows they're still in business.

Check-out the link below for the engine adapters they make - fourth from the bottom of the 4 CYL. ENGINES list - Honda S2000!

http://www.kennedyeng.com/vw_por.htm
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:55 AM
  #18  
MarkB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,979
Likes: 0
From: North Yorks
Default

Someone did it with a Skoda Estelle.

They called it the Spazda
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #19  
loftust's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,234
Likes: 3
From: Fareham, Hants
Default

I had a Mk1 MX5...fookin' brilliant car...was an Eunos too, so it had leather interior, AC + a few other bits 'n' bobs that don't come standard on UK versions.

Cheap to buy/run/modify, with loads of parts available off the shelf. Second hand spares are freely available and dirt cheap compared to the S.

If you want a rotary engine, get the RX8's...the 7 needs rebuilding all the time and constantly breaks down.

If you want a stock engine, the best one comes in the Mk2 1.8 sport 6 speed package. You can get a turbo/supercharger for these and easily raise power to around 180BHP.

The Mk1 is the lightest though, 1994 onwards models put on a few pounds due to safety features. The earlier MK1s were also rust proofed better, which can be an issue on later models.

It's the best handling car I've ever driven and smiles per pound are through the roof.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 10:19 AM
  #20  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

...fortunately.

I ordered my 1.8 as a true lightweight special, without PAS or gewgaws or shit.

If you drove it with the throttle basically in the 'on' position, it was great!

I'd not like to drive one after the S2000, though! They feel very flimsy and slow by comparison. That's not to say it's not a brilliant car; merely the S2000 is even brilliantester.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Oktanio
Introductions
0
Oct 8, 2018 05:24 PM
Scot
Car and Bike Talk
66
Jul 20, 2012 04:49 PM
vader1
Car and Bike Talk
16
Feb 16, 2009 07:25 AM
SideWaysOnFire
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
112
Jan 21, 2009 04:24 AM
TRDLiquidSilver
Car and Bike Talk
23
Jun 24, 2008 10:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.