Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

those new range rover things.

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 06:24 AM
  #11  
(S2K4ME)'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Tring
Default

Originally Posted by AquilaEagle
Been off roading in one, and I was very impressed
That's the good thing about LR & RR brand - they haven't forgotten their roots even though I'm sure they know circa 75% of the owners will not use it in that way.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 12:04 PM
  #12  
CHIPPO's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 88
From: Soham Cambridgeshire
Default

Are the roots of this car not Mondeo and Volvo !
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

It IS a distant cousin of the XC60 and a Ford Exploder, or something.

But since it's modern plank-sharing there's little directly interchangeable.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 12:46 PM
  #14  
CHIPPO's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 88
From: Soham Cambridgeshire
Default

The disco 3 was going to be built on an Exploder chassis if the Solihul boys didnt get their act together , Ford gave them 6 months to design some thing that might hold together. Hence gear box and drive train are not LR made, but come from outside now , Darla i think
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 01:45 PM
  #15  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,301
Likes: 832
From: Nottingham
Default

What is the point? Someone please explain because unless it's to piss off the green party I don't get it, weighs the same as a tank, drinks like a tank, has no guns like a tank, panels dent like a car.

Will always be driven by nobs
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2011 | 12:36 AM
  #16  
soulcrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,680
Likes: 0
From: OLD SOUTH WALES
Default

tanks have guns.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2011 | 04:30 AM
  #17  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Tanks don't kill people. Guns do. Unless it's Tianenmen Square.

People usually purchase-justify on the grounds of space for children, or somesuch. Yet that is largely an illusion created by a high, square roofline & the legroom is in reality far more cramped than a transverse-engined MPV or a even regular-sized estate car, neither of which require the ridiculously-wide wheelset to stop them falling over.

The reality must be "image". Otherwise you'd just buy a Cash & Carry or a C of E, which are closer to a C-segment in packaging & running costs terms.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2011 | 07:34 AM
  #18  
CHIPPO's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 88
From: Soham Cambridgeshire
Default

I was told the reason for buying one; in this particular instance was , 1) Road presence 2) Space 3) Practicality 4) Safety etc etc !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think road presence means to ability to bully other drivers




Reply
Old Aug 20, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #19  
mikey k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 25,566
Likes: 2
From: Heart of England
Default

They are one of our customers.
Its called the Evoque.
The chassis is shared with the latest Freelander.
You WILL be seeing alot of these - ALL production slots for the next 9 months are allocated & customer cars have just started going out this month.
The FWD version has very low CO2 so will become a favourite when it is launched early next year.
I've never been a fan of JLR product but this is actually very good.
LSB loves it because it sits high, she can see more and "feels" safer.
Next generation will have an aluminium/bonded bodyshell to further reduce the weight.
The factory hate the contrasting roof colour as they have to take it off the line and repaint the roof taking an extra 4 hours per car
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #20  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,301
Likes: 832
From: Nottingham
Default

Regardless of who likes it, it is still shit.

High c of g, heavy, not very aerodynamic. It's a D&G car driven by a badge obsessed nobber IMO.

An X5 driver attempted to kill me on the bike recently, in hindsight I wish I'd have reacted more than I did. There is no need for 4x4s on the road, they're not safer, they are worse at avoiding accidents in the first place and people drive them with a false sense of security

They should not have airbags IMO
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.