Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Total ban on drinking and driving.

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #41  
Boab01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,433
Likes: 0
From: North, no further!
Default

Originally Posted by martin j,Oct 9 2008, 11:51 AM
3.5 years for taking two lives under any circumstances deserves much more than this sentence, 35 years would be more appropriate, if he felt really bad about it I'd loan him a few feet of rope and and a chair for use in his 8x6 cell.
So out of interest, if they hadn't been drinking previously but still took lives from careless driving you would have them do 35 years as well? I don't know I can't be impartial about this, I genuinely think that if you take life by driving dangerously or irresponsibly then you should lose your licence permanently but what exactly would sending the guy to prison until he's dead do?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 05:25 AM
  #42  
martin j's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,434
Likes: 312
From: Dunfermline.
Default

Ok, maybe if they had been sober 35 years is a tad heavy.
How many people get a driving ban and continue to drive anyway though?
How many killers would you need to jail with this kind of sentence before others took notice?, if sentences were applied to the max and the convicted had to serve the whole time, the public at large may not feel as if the judges need a kick in the ************* and replaced.
If it had my kids and spouse I'd want to wait outside the jail on his release, rip his head off and piss down the hole in his neck, I could then surrender to plod and get about 8 years for it. And then be met by his brother/cousin etc.
The courts need to be seen to meet out justice and the prisons reformed so they are not comfortable but genuine deterents.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 07:52 AM
  #43  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by Papillon,Oct 9 2008, 04:34 PM
It's quite true that the body retains some alcohol permanently, and thus a zero rating would be impossible to enforce.

Equally, whilst it is true that a moderate amount of alcohol (in line with current laws) does impact driving ability, this cannot be looked at in a vacuum. There are a million and one things that have an effect on driving competence at any given moment, from tiredness, to the kids arguing in the back seat (we're probably safe on this one), to a comedy on the radio or a good discussion/good song, to a good looking woman walking along the street in a short skirt.

The truth is that the ideal of a perfect level of concentration and competence is impossible to achieve; there will always be some reason for a depressed level of skill and aptitude.

Drink/driving statistics in Britain actually measure up very well to other comparable countries. Drink related accidents do indeed include those where the driver was sober but the pedestrian hammered.

The problem with drivers who do drink is rarely the one of someone being somewhere near the limit, it is those who intend to ignore any law put in place by drinking as much as they feel like and then getting behind the wheel.
Very well-considered post.

The other danger of whipping-horse syndrome is that in some cases the alcohol is used as an excuse not to bother looking properly at the cause of the accident and more people will be involved to the same spot in the future. JJ Leeming's book mentions one such example.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bugsy
New York - Upstate New York S2000 Owners
11
Sep 21, 2009 04:48 AM
airgate
Dragon Events
103
Sep 1, 2009 05:35 PM
cgkms
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
61
May 20, 2007 05:55 AM
Aze85
Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners
1
Oct 18, 2004 09:37 PM
negcamber
S2000 Racing and Competition
7
Sep 6, 2002 10:31 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 AM.