[QUOTE=kevineaton,Sep 20 2008, 03:43 PM] guys, please, i dont care if star trek had 73 or 72 episodes, or if the z3 was called an m or whatever...its

 

Nerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd

 

Nah.

I had to look that up.

 

aaaaaaaand, back on topic.

I agree with the bad interior comments, they are well screwed together (roof will work better than the s2000's), but aesthetically, they are awful

 

Could a CO compare the inbound IP addresses of Gadaffi and Greg for me please.

...and if Greg is a proxied login then that is conclusive enough for me

 

I test drove one at woods of bournemouth, i also drove the foot version... Great BMW garage... They let me drive a couple... One had a very distinct hesitation while accelerating... It seemed to pull hard for a really long time.. both of them had the blue leather, which i am not a fan of. Also i hated the little bit of glass in the door between the windscreen... it looks strange whilst driving.. why they didn't just fit a bigger window?

 

LMFAO.

Too much seriousness on here lately.
Lets get out in the sun (its georgeous in Somerset this weekend)

 

ok, im not buying the Z3M....mainly because i discovered last night whilst pissed that i can get a Z4 for the same money...

so, now....whats the story ...Z4 vs S2000....


no more nerds fights please thoguh!

 

Which Z4?

The S is better than anything up to the 3 litre versions.

 

Depends which model you are looking at.

Z4 3.0 OR Z4 M Roadster or Coupe.

All very different cars.

All very different from the S2000.

Mainly in feel. BMW's feel heavy in comparison and possibly a little softer/ forgiving although the ride in the Z4 is quite firm.

BMW always produce a good engine especially in straight six form and they are tourquey.

Best advice. GO AND DRIVE ONE!!

And stop calling the BMW M Roadster a Z3M!

You have now been educated in this matter.