Solstice GXP article
I have test driven one... not the GXP though. You remember what i said about it then. I will withhold judgement on the GXP til I can drive it too, but if the handling is the same... booo gm.
I think the suspension will probably be modded for the extra power and whatnot. But like every other shot an american vendor makes at the sports car market... they usually fail to create a winner in all categories. I wouldnt want to wreck that car ill tell youthat much. I like the looks of it with the top down tho, top up makes me wanna
uke:
uke:
I'll put it this way, for the money, it isn't bad. But for the same cash, I could by the MX-5 which is built much better for the same price. And all of the details (i am a detail person) on the MX-5 make it , atleast to me more for your money. Same can go for the S2000 and GXP, sure the GXP may be faster, but will it look like it has been driven for ten years by the time it is 2. And will the usual things so common to GM break.. like cup holders, door latches, handles, ect... not to mention that overly complicated and oddly folding top.
[QUOTE=MulderATO,Apr 10 2006, 05:06 PM] NOT MY ARTICLE! JUST FOUND THIS AND SHARED..........
It's a turbocharged 2.4-liter Ecotec four with an amazing 260 horsepower and 260 foot-pounds of torque. GM says that makes the Ecotec turbo its highest specific-output engine ever
It's a turbocharged 2.4-liter Ecotec four with an amazing 260 horsepower and 260 foot-pounds of torque. GM says that makes the Ecotec turbo its highest specific-output engine ever
Originally Posted by Dolemike,Apr 11 2006, 09:39 AM
Im fairly certain everyone here can agree that our car does more like mid to low 5 second sprint to 60. I can tell thats an obvious biased letter to hype the car. Should be a decent performer, I wonder how well it well hold together before it breaks.
Road & Track article from January 2001
Regardless, I simply do NOT like the heavy lines of the Solstice. It's just plain ugly IMO. Then again, I AM prejudiced!





