[QUOTE]Originally posted by brantshali
Geez...can't people stay out of trouble for just a few days while I go on a trip?!

Unfortunately, I've been out of the loop a little bit on this trip, because time for being online has not been plentiful, but I HAVE seen the pics in question.

My take is that the pics DID push the rules, but that the crackdown is as much personal as it is about violating board rules.

That said, Alex has known for ages that he pushes rules and he's been unpopular with some of the mods.

 

can I post a picture of my cack?

 

according to Google, this is what my cack looks like:

 

I'm not arguing this point.

Alex and several others are definitely on the mod list and they are scrutinized more than others are. That said, most of the people on said list are scrutinized for a reason...because something about the nature of their posting style is considered to be either more inflamatory or more likely to push the boundaries of what the management considers appropriate...and therefore potentially encourage others to do the same.

My problem is that I think that the enforcing of the rules is at least somewhat biased. I don't think that we (mods) have done a very good job of uniformly enforcing our interpretations of propriety.

 

no need explain mods to me.... I understand what happened and why...

 

what the happened anyway???



Did Alex post some nasty pics or something?

Seriously, I have no clue WTF is going on..


as usual.

 

Life is so much simpler in the socal furum. We only ban people for making death threats.

 

that's hideous

I need therapy now...

 

I saw the pics.. They DID push the line, and they were inevitably going to be deleted, but that's not the point. Deleting a post is one thing, banning someone for borderline material is another. As Alex said, not to name names, but if posting pics of half naked girls gets people banned, then lots of people should have been banned by now.

 

I know that I'm guilty of it...


So again, what were they? Nudie pics?