06 s2k crash fatality
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
06 s2k crash fatality
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/554057.html
watch the vid (look at rear tires)
basically both guys died, first one died on impact and the other at the hostpital.
They were driving and supposably passing up slower cars, when he lost control and spun around and the truck hit them.
Please guys change ur tires. As you can see his were bald and even VSA cant save bald tires.!!!!!!
watch the vid (look at rear tires)
basically both guys died, first one died on impact and the other at the hostpital.
They were driving and supposably passing up slower cars, when he lost control and spun around and the truck hit them.
Please guys change ur tires. As you can see his were bald and even VSA cant save bald tires.!!!!!!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
ho shit .,...it very hard..no trunk anymore..
has we can see,it has not very broken in the Cell-Life.
The s2000 seem to be really really strong at this place..
But i'm so sorry for the family and like Stealth said, Change you tire with its needed...But it on VISA if you don't have the money
or i dont know.This can Change everything!
has we can see,it has not very broken in the Cell-Life.
The s2000 seem to be really really strong at this place..
But i'm so sorry for the family and like Stealth said, Change you tire with its needed...But it on VISA if you don't have the money
or i dont know.This can Change everything!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Originally Posted by GrandMasterKhan' date='Jan 13 2009, 11:18 AM
wow how fast was he going? That is some serious damage!
Im wondering if he was whereing a seatbelt.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
I hit a concrete wall going backwards at probably 70 mph (on track) and it did less damage than that. However, I suspect the truck concentrated the impact into a smaller and higher point. Looks like the main structure of the frame may have dove under the main structure of the truck, this allowing the damage to get much farther into the passenger area of the car than it would have if the contact was bumper-to-bumper.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Originally Posted by mikegarrison' date='Jan 13 2009, 11:29 AM
I hit a concrete wall going backwards at probably 70 mph (on track) and it did less damage than that. However, I suspect the truck concentrated the impact into a smaller and higher point. Looks like the main structure of the frame may have dove under the main structure of the truck, this allowing the damage to get much farther into the passenger area of the car than it would have if the contact was bumper-to-bumper.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 5
From: In a glass case of emotion!
Originally Posted by gilgothdae' date='Jan 13 2009, 02:13 PM
freakin stupid. tires are you last life line people.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by mikegarrison' date='Jan 13 2009, 02:29 PM
I hit a concrete wall going backwards at probably 70 mph (on track) and it did less damage than that. However, I suspect the truck concentrated the impact into a smaller and higher point. Looks like the main structure of the frame may have dove under the main structure of the truck, this allowing the damage to get much farther into the passenger area of the car than it would have if the contact was bumper-to-bumper.
wall = 0 mph, no momentum...
truck = say he was only doing 25mph * 4500lbs of truck = a lot of momentum