S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

06 s2k crash fatality

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #11  
Riceboi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 2
From: Nor Cal
Default

Damn I didn't know you could die getting hit from the rear, I always though a rear hit is safer than a front head on hit.

It looks like the driver is still alive but in critical condition.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #12  
Stealth_SUX_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Riceboi' date='Jan 13 2009, 11:51 AM
Damn I didn't know you could die getting hit from the rear, I always though a rear hit is safer than a front head on hit.

It looks like the driver is still alive but in critical condition.
no driver is no longer alive, he died today.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #13  
InterHat's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 458
Likes: 5
Default

Makes me glad I have 255's on the rear and 215's on the front...
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #14  
RavynX's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Edit: Long day at work, thinking at current moment != logical.

Poor driver. You gotta always have good rubber on all 4 tires. I know it may be a recession but your car is one of the the last places you want to skimp on.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #15  
Riceboi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 2
From: Nor Cal
Default

Originally Posted by RavynX' date='Jan 13 2009, 12:15 PM
I know it may be a recession but your car is one of the the last places you want to skimp on.
Is that the excuse you tell your wife? hahaha
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #16  
Silver04S2000's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Default

sad story...

like others have said, tires are VERY important.

drive safely everyone.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #17  
chiney_dolly's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

wow... yeh those tires are horid..
and look at the weather...

you know tho... accidents are a sad but weird tihng.... if you look at the passenger side... i've seen ppl walk out of worse than that.
its just so sad.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #18  
s2kobsession's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,874
Likes: 1
From: Lower Mainland
Default

RIP to both passengers

s2k's are dropping off the planet like flies. What makes this so sad is that a couple hundred bucks to buy new tires (even if it was just rear tires) would have avoided this whole situation
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #19  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by thebig33tuna' date='Jan 13 2009, 11:49 AM
he spun out and hit an oncoming vehicle, so the force of impact is significantly more than hitting a wall at 70.

wall = 0 mph, no momentum...
truck = say he was only doing 25mph * 4500lbs of truck = a lot of momentum
No, it's not. Hitting a completely stationary object is much worse than hitting another vehicle. What I hit was a Jersey-type wall, so it has a bit more give than a permanent concrete wall. Plus, I was lucky enouth that it was angled, so I partially glanced off of it. But hitting a stationary object at X mph dead on is like hitting a car dead on at twice that MPH.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #20  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by RavynX' date='Jan 13 2009, 12:15 PM
Like thebig33tuna said...

Wall = 0mph, S2k = 70mph (guessing)
Truck = 60 mph, S2k = 70mph.

Hitting the truck would be like crashing into a wall at 130mph, hence the nasty damage.
No, you have the math wrong.

The point is that both vehicles share the impact energy, while in the concrete wall case the car takes almost all the impact energy. It's twice as bad to hit a wall as hitting a stationary car. Thus, hitting a wall is approximately as bad as hitting another car head on which is travelling the same speed as you.

In this case that truck was heavier than the car, so the energy was not equally shared. Thus the collision in this case was somewhere between hitting another car and hitting a stationary wall.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 PM.