My SPARK PLUG experience-
I decided to take a look at my plugs at 27,500 miles- found that #3 and #4 were WAY undertorqued at the factory, and there was no sign of any anti-sieze compound having been used. I brass wire brushed the threads, applied a VERY thin coat of anti-sieze campound(per the Honda service manual) and torqued the plug to 13 ft-lbs. I found that if you hold the torque with the wrench (bend-bar type-NOT the clicker type which are all JUNK (IMHO)) for a time the plugs continue turning at the specified torque for a considerable amount of time. I think 13# is a good number especially with the anti-sieze compound acting as a lubricant going in. Primary function of spark-plug torquing is heat-transfer from the hot plug to the head(instead of to the coil) but over-torqueing could compromise the threads. Don't be tempted!
One reason for checking the plugs was to see if the 1qt/1500 miles I've seen since switching to Mobile 1 (10W-30) might be due to bad rings on one cylinder. happily, I found no raw oil or oil fouling, but I'm sure glad I found the loose plugs before they led to serious damage.
WRT oil consumption, this post by SEEKERone in response to another thread I started is interesting-
"honda's official word to us dealership technicians
1 quart per 1000 miles is normal and acceptable
synthetic burns a little bit more
but most important
use 10W30 oil...use of 5W30 or 5W20 will cause more rapid consumption of oil"
One reason for checking the plugs was to see if the 1qt/1500 miles I've seen since switching to Mobile 1 (10W-30) might be due to bad rings on one cylinder. happily, I found no raw oil or oil fouling, but I'm sure glad I found the loose plugs before they led to serious damage.
WRT oil consumption, this post by SEEKERone in response to another thread I started is interesting-
"honda's official word to us dealership technicians
1 quart per 1000 miles is normal and acceptable
synthetic burns a little bit more
but most important
use 10W30 oil...use of 5W30 or 5W20 will cause more rapid consumption of oil"
There's a new TSB out for the plugs specifying 18 ft-lbs instead of 13. Also, when the search function comes back up, look for anti-sieze and sparkplug...it's been decided that anti-sieze stuff is bad since it allows you to effectively torque to nearly TWICE what you have your wrench set at. In a nutshell, when giving a torque rating, friction between the bolt and hole is included in the calculation.
The new TSB indicates that the plugs should be torqued to 18 ft-lbs. Torque is relative. There is run down torque, break out torque, service torque, and final torque just to name a few. Most Automotive service manuals (as well as AMM's - Airframe Maintenance Manuals and TSO's -Technical Service Orders) reference final torque. The actual service torque should be the run down torque + the final torque. This would say that I would add less with anti-seize then a dry metal for the additive run down torque. Improper torquing of fasteners is the number one cause of accidents in the aviation industry today. I have studied this subject for many years and currently work with the FAA to try to improve knowledge of torque requirements amongst the Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) mechanic community.
Utah
P.S. The final goal of torque is a attaining a prescribed degree of stretch in the fastener.
Utah
P.S. The final goal of torque is a attaining a prescribed degree of stretch in the fastener.
Originally posted by Utah S2K
The new TSB indicates that the plugs should be torqued to 18 ft-lbs. Torque is relative. There is run down torque, break out torque, service torque, and final torque just to name a few. Most Automotive service manuals (as well as AMM's - Airframe Maintenance Manuals and TSO's -Technical Service Orders) reference final torque. The actual service torque should be the run down torque + the final torque. This would say that I would add less with anti-seize then a dry metal for the additive run down torque. Improper torquing of fasteners is the number one cause of accidents in the aviation industry today. I have studied this subject for many years and currently work with the FAA to try to improve knowledge of torque requirements amongst the Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) mechanic community.
Utah
P.S. The final goal of torque is a attaining a prescribed degree of stretch in the fastener.
The new TSB indicates that the plugs should be torqued to 18 ft-lbs. Torque is relative. There is run down torque, break out torque, service torque, and final torque just to name a few. Most Automotive service manuals (as well as AMM's - Airframe Maintenance Manuals and TSO's -Technical Service Orders) reference final torque. The actual service torque should be the run down torque + the final torque. This would say that I would add less with anti-seize then a dry metal for the additive run down torque. Improper torquing of fasteners is the number one cause of accidents in the aviation industry today. I have studied this subject for many years and currently work with the FAA to try to improve knowledge of torque requirements amongst the Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) mechanic community.
Utah
P.S. The final goal of torque is a attaining a prescribed degree of stretch in the fastener.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Silver02
Why did you install the old plugs? Seat washers only crush once.
Why did you install the old plugs? Seat washers only crush once.
Seriously- its done every day by mechanics everywhere. (See sec. 4- p. 19 of the official Honda service manual for the S2K)
Uhhhh, OK.....I'm wrong about it being decided as an absolute. Frankly, that post scared me making me think I was actually torqueing everything to twice what's recommended, but also figured that's what happens everyday in most service centers (so it couldn't be ALL bad). I'll just smile and nod on this one, regardless of the outcome...don't know enough to fight for either side this time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




