Introductions Make your introductions to the S2000 owner community. Discussions and comments from new and future S2000 owners. You will get a warm welcome, friendly and helpful advice. The 'Start Button' of the forums.

Boxster vs. S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:16 PM
  #71  
DaAntiRicer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Queens/Rochester NY
Default

[QUOTE=chickdr,Sep 25 2007, 07:37 AM] Remember the Boxster has 4 wheel ventillated Bremo's as well.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #72  
plokivos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 2
From: atlanta
Default

i like how s2000 looks better than boxster. but boxsters got more stuff.

it's the ladder system. boxster s (more stuff) > s2000 (less stuff) > Lotus (nothing).

but for the money, and if you track, s2000 is a great car. if you're big, fat, or whatever, you need to get something bigger than s2000 or lotus, like boxster.

as far as the reliability goes, ask the porsche mechanics and honda mechanics which car they would rather buy.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #73  
chickdr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Ermac!,Sep 25 2007, 04:15 PM
LOL @ an ugly Cayenne SUV getting more street credibility than an s2000.
I think you're in the wrong forum.



Curb appeal is nothing but opinion, as is what effect you think a Boxster has on people. LOL. You keep saying Porsche instead of "Boxster".



The argument isn't that a Porsche Boxster has better braking performance than an S2000; the argument is that a 2002 Porsche Boxster costs way more to maintain than my 2002 Honda S2000, yet is lacking in nearly all aspects.

I've driven a base Porsche Boxster on numerous occasions and I have yet to be impressed by anything more than handling and braking.
I keep saying Porsche because the Boxster IS a Porsche. I always find it amusing to read the comment "a Boxster is not a real Porsche". What isn't real about it? This is like saying a Civic isn't a real Honda because the S2000 exists. What a rediculous concept. There are many people who buy the Boxster(and now the Cayman) over the more expensive Carrera. Why? Because they weigh less and are the most pure sports cars in the line. The Carrera is more of a GT car unless you go for the GT2/3 version.

As far as I have seen there are many, many Porsches other than the 911(Carrera). The only one I would dispute as being a real Porsche is the original 924 which used a lame Audi 4-cylinder engine. Since that time Porsche has used its own motors, with the exception of the 3.2l/3.6l V-6 in the Cayenne.

I picked the S2K this time around only because I couldn't get a deal like I did on my '02 Boxster. I like my S2K, but if I had a choice, an 06 Boxster would be in my garage right now.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #74  
chickdr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by DaAntiRicer,Sep 25 2007, 08:16 PM
4 wheel brembos doesn't matter. Look up stopping distances, they are identical. That just means it costs more to replace pads and rotors (if they crack, not sure if they are just slotted or cross drilled).

I wasn't referring to stopping distances, but the Boxster's brakes are simply amazing. The S2K's are fine, but the Brembo's are simply better as far as modulaton is concerned. I am sure the parts for the Boxster are more $$$ just based on the fact they ae larger and have 4 wheel ventillated discs(cross drilled on all S's and newer base models as well).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
21k
Car and Bike Talk
23
Jan 24, 2010 11:59 AM
Archon007
Car and Bike Talk
50
Jan 19, 2006 08:10 PM
bhav
Car and Bike Talk
21
Jul 14, 2004 01:53 PM
Freznal
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
12
Apr 8, 2003 03:51 AM
leas2000
S2000 Talk
12
Oct 25, 2002 03:33 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 PM.