Why wouldn't you get a Porsche Boxster over the S?
Originally Posted by marrenr813,Oct 9 2006, 07:04 PM
Why would you buy a boxter if it was not an S model? The base model is a waste of money, escpecially compared to an S2. You know why the used prices are so close even though the price of both cars new is so far apart is because the S2000 is the better car and holds its value better.
Originally Posted by chickdr,Oct 10 2006, 05:25 AM
Can't agree with you on that one. I just turned my base 2002 Boxster in. The 2.7l engine is strong enough for almost any driving situation - in the USA anyway. Amazing handling. that is the main difference I have noted in my short time with my S2K. It handles well but does not have the unflappable solidity of the Boxster even though the cars weigh the same. The Porsche gives you amazing stick and still manages to handle frost heaves and pot holes with aplomb(the S2K is a bit jittery in comparison). That is what the extra money buys you, as well as the rock solid door closure and two trunks.
I don't know if I'll ever buy another Honda, but I chose the S over a Boxster (or any German car) due to initial cost, reliability, and maintain costs - also I just got tired of owning German cars and wanted something different.
The S2000 just fits the bill better and feels lighter on its feet. The only car I'd trade the S in for swould be a Boxster though - nothing else comes close. After optioning a Boxster with some basic stuff I was well north of 40k, so the one-size-fits-all S2000 was the preferred choice. Then I drove one, and it won my heart.
The S2000 just fits the bill better and feels lighter on its feet. The only car I'd trade the S in for swould be a Boxster though - nothing else comes close. After optioning a Boxster with some basic stuff I was well north of 40k, so the one-size-fits-all S2000 was the preferred choice. Then I drove one, and it won my heart.
Porsche Boxsters are lemons I tell ya!
Not only that, they're overpriced and I honestly like the way the S looks much better. Another reason is because I'm used to cars with engines in the front. My uncle has a Volkswagen Karman-Ghia, and although that's an older car, working on that engine was like learning everything all over again. I would go with the S even if they both costed the same.
Not only that, they're overpriced and I honestly like the way the S looks much better. Another reason is because I'm used to cars with engines in the front. My uncle has a Volkswagen Karman-Ghia, and although that's an older car, working on that engine was like learning everything all over again. I would go with the S even if they both costed the same.
Originally Posted by mgp 2675,Oct 10 2006, 08:52 PM
Porsche Boxsters are lemons I tell ya!
Not only that, they're overpriced and I honestly like the way the S looks much better. Another reason is because I'm used to cars with engines in the front. My uncle has a Volkswagen Karman-Ghia, and although that's an older car, working on that engine was like learning everything all over again. I would go with the S even if they both costed the same.
Not only that, they're overpriced and I honestly like the way the S looks much better. Another reason is because I'm used to cars with engines in the front. My uncle has a Volkswagen Karman-Ghia, and although that's an older car, working on that engine was like learning everything all over again. I would go with the S even if they both costed the same.
Originally Posted by Lionheart,Oct 10 2006, 02:27 PM
Can't agree with you on that one... 2.7 always seemed and feeled a little underpowered for the Porsche badge imo and I had a few times I nearly went of the road in 'normal' spirited driving conditions with the Boxster where ESP saved me where I never felt the slightest twitch with the S. But that's just my opinion.
As an aside, I looked seriously at the Z350 Roadster before deciding on the S2K. The Nissan folks wanted about the same amount as a Boxster would have cost. When I told them it made no sense as the Z350R cost only a couple of thousand more than a S2K- they said - the Z350 is not really a competitor to the 4-cyl S2K, we consider it a Boxster competitor... Lets see- the S2K and Boxster weigh the same and have about the same hp. The Z350R weighs an extra 700lbs. Yes, the 350Z is a natural competitor to the Boxster
If I were to buy a Boxster I would just wish I had a Cayman, if I bought I Cayman, I would just wish I had a 911. If I bought a 911, I would wish I could get a 911 GT3. I will just wait until I can afford the GT3.






