2.7 L Stroker Dyno....
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 33,838
Likes: 23
From: Sunshine Coast - England UK
Wow - impressive development!
Do you offer a warranty with the build?
I presume the cylinder walls are now much thinner, and more prone to failure with an increased frictional heat? Have you done anything to combat that or dont see it as an issue?
Do you offer a warranty with the build?
I presume the cylinder walls are now much thinner, and more prone to failure with an increased frictional heat? Have you done anything to combat that or dont see it as an issue?
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Berlina#2290,May 27 2007, 09:21 AM
damn w/ 300whp i'd be tempted to keep the stock exhaust and murder everything, SLEEPER STYLE~ those are some awsome numbers, im adding this to my list of options if i ever need a rebuild!
Sponsor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 68
From: TX
Originally Posted by trivium,May 27 2007, 09:56 PM
This is truly amazing.
But...
am I the only who is completely turned off by the fact that this dyno is on C12 fuel? Lets see this stuff off of 91 or 93 octane gas!
But...
am I the only who is completely turned off by the fact that this dyno is on C12 fuel? Lets see this stuff off of 91 or 93 octane gas!
Remember C12 does not have more BTUs, it just has higher octane which allows for better timing before it knocks with higher CR and/or higher RPMs. This accounts for better torque curves.
W/O C12, how timing will need to be pulled and how far will torque drop?
__________________
