JDM Tuning Expert advice and discussion on JDM tuning for your S2000.

Amuse or J's racing header?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:50 AM
  #11  
yosephs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by carrera4,Nov 27 2007, 07:51 PM
The Amuse is a very nice looking header and is very light (even though only 2 pounds lighter than most aftermarket headers) but it hasn't been shown to make substantial power.

You can pull dyno after dyno on the toda, j's and tracy sports but I have never seen one for the amuse that shows much of any increase in power.

In this respect the Amuse is similar to the ASM.
i think the tracy sports header ur talking abt it is the prototype tracy sports header which has proven to make alot of power.

do u have a dyno of the amuse header? i never saw one on here
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:21 AM
  #12  
LostMotion's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,217
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by yosephs2k,Nov 28 2007, 02:50 AM
i think the tracy sports header ur talking abt it is the prototype tracy sports header which has proven to make alot of power.

do u have a dyno of the amuse header? i never saw one on here
I'm not referring to the prototype. The tracy sports header you can get anywhere has shown very strong power gain. 5-8hp untuned with AFRs of 12. Lots of room there for tuning to show gains. 15 peak hp not by any means impossible with the header.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:25 AM
  #13  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by carrera4,Nov 28 2007, 10:21 AM
I'm not referring to the prototype. The tracy sports header you can get anywhere has shown very strong power gain. 5-8hp untuned with AFRs of 12. Lots of room there for tuning to show gains. 15 peak hp not by any means impossible with the header.
Quick question. If a header flows better than stock, wouldn't the tendency be a leaner-than-before AF ratio? If one put a free-flowing header on and still was running that rich(12:1), that would have been a horrific tune to begin with, no?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:58 AM
  #14  
icemans2k02's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,798
Likes: 3
Default

Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:43 AM
  #15  
LostMotion's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,217
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Nov 28 2007, 08:25 AM
Quick question. If a header flows better than stock, wouldn't the tendency be a leaner-than-before AF ratio? If one put a free-flowing header on and still was running that rich(12:1), that would have been a horrific tune to begin with, no?
Was on stock ECU...

Ultimately the only way to tell is to do back to back tuned, other than that it is somewhat speculation.

Based on what I have seen, I would give the Tracy Sports, J's, Toda, Mugen 2.2L and Hytech a green light. Could you spend the same money somewhere else for better results? Perhaps, but if you are set on a header the above have all prove decent results.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:46 AM
  #16  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Oh, ok. So it was tuned. When you said untuned, I automatically assumed aftermarket ecu.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #17  
LostMotion's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,217
Likes: 4
Default

It was untuned after the header and tuned before. Stock ECU before and after the header.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #18  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by carrera4,Nov 28 2007, 11:48 AM
It was untuned after the header and tuned before. Stock ECU before and after the header.
Seriously, I am confused. How can that be? If the header is less restrictive and the ecu did not have time to relearn, why would the AF ratio go richer? It would still think it had more restriction, hence less fuel.

I'd also wonder why the stock ecu wasn't reset prior to the "after" runs.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 08:22 AM
  #19  
LostMotion's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,217
Likes: 4
Default

Unfortunelty, I can't give you any more insight. Prima facie you make a good argument, but there may be some hidden complexity here that makes it hard to draw firm conclusions.

I would love to have a back to back header shootout with the 5-7 most popular performance headers, but it makes no sense economically for one person to do the testing the absolute right way so we end up piecing things together from lots of disparate data and forming opinions which can't be directly supported and hence can easily be attacked. So for anyone else reading, this is one person's opinion based on lots of disparate data, take it for what it's worth.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #20  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

I don't know everything, and most of what I do know I learned on here or by doing myself on the S2000. I appreciate your insight.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:15 AM.