JDM Tuning Expert advice and discussion on JDM tuning for your S2000.

Berk header dyno

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 11:58 AM
  #21  
rwheelz's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 118
From: Montana
Default

this dyno says SAE corrected, so it doesn't matter what temp etc the conditions were... so long as your next dyno is also SAE corrected, they should be comparable.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #22  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I'll reserve my final judgement of this header until AFTER you get the car retuned at Church's.

Also, did you give the car a chance to "relearn" after you installed the header (and before you got back on the dyno)? An ECU reset (and mandatory relearning time) is a must after installing any performance part...especially with something that changes the flow of a car, such as a header.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #23  
rwheelz's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 118
From: Montana
Default

It is hard to see if you can't open his dyno sheets full sized (I can now, but couldn't before) you can see his A/F curve looks the same, thus his argument for it not needing any time to adjust. Berk's clearly showed the tune was off, until the ecu had time to adapt.

I would say to reset the ECU, and then make sure you drive it around a bunch to let it re-learn under the new conditions, before going to the dyno. If you can go to the same dyno, and use SAE correction each time, then changes in weather will be negligible.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #24  
smirfs2k05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,255
Likes: 0
From: Victorville
Default

Originally Posted by silverstonejedi,Oct 29 2007, 07:04 AM
Where was this dyno'd?
Hesperia, CA Advanced Performance
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #25  
03supers2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,997
Likes: 0
From: chino hills
Default

+5 horsepower anywhere on a s2k's powerband is good to me
Loosing 11lbs just swapping out an header is good to me so paul
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #26  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

So, did you ever get it retuned?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #27  
smirfs2k05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,255
Likes: 0
From: Victorville
Default

Trying to find a harness for my vafc...if not I'm just gonna hardwire it
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 06:40 AM
  #28  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

Interesting results. I'm going to link these to the header thread.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2012 | 06:47 PM
  #29  
s2000maniac's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 15
Default

wait so did the berk header gain or lost power?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2012 | 07:25 PM
  #30  
jh4db536's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 637
Likes: 2
Default

I think a more objective test would've been stock header + testpipe + catback vs stock header + testpipe + catback (and tuning on both would take it to a higher level). In all honesty, you probably wouldn't expect a significant change from a header if you didnt change the stuff downstream...especially given that the stock header is very good except in the weight department. I really think that would hold true with any header whether it was a J's racing or a ebay PLM.

I have a berk header myself, my main gripe with it is that it needs a lower bracket to deal with an engine that apparently squirms in the engine bay.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 PM.