New England S2000 Owners New England S2000 Owners

I'm speechless

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 03:48 AM
  #31  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue,Dec 17 2007, 12:03 PM
I get depressed when I watch tech shows (like last night) on highways of the future.
they sing the praises of cars will navigate themselves on the highways and through intersections.
If indeed that does happen in my lifetime I don't care, because I'll be able to drive a '57 MGA, or a '90 CRX-Si, or a '02 S2000.


Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 03:50 AM
  #32  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Dec 17 2007, 02:18 PM
Kinda.
How in the hell can you like it?
Seriously, it has to have the same appetite for gasoline as my Titan, and we all know you hate that.
I'm just saying...
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #33  
gladwins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Default

Nissan GT-R dynoed at 475 hp, 428 lb.-ft. of torque

Once again, wow.
Very wow.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #34  
elmmx5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,667
Likes: 0
From: Crack house in Norton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by gladwins,Dec 18 2007, 12:47 PM
My favorite part of that article is they imply because they ran it on a dynapack dyno without wheels and tires those figures are not wheel hp. I guess removing the wheels somehow eliminates all other drivetrain losses.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:55 AM
  #35  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Triple-H,Dec 18 2007, 07:50 AM
How in the hell can you like it?
Seriously, it has to have the same appetite for gasoline as my Titan, and we all know you hate that.
I'm just saying...
Yeah, but it doesn't block my view as I drive down the street. Plus, I support using excess fuel for high performance cars. I think fuel used for trucks and SUVs to commute to work is a waste of a precious commodity that should be reserved for pleasurable pass times like meaningless drives in the country in a sports car. People should walk to work, bike, or take a bus or a train. At the very most, people should use a small four cylinder commuter car to drive to work. Going to work is a chore and we should be the most energy efficient when commuting as part of our employment.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #36  
HARDtoTOP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15,719
Likes: 0
From: Westport, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Dec 18 2007, 01:55 PM
Yeah, but it doesn't block my view as I drive down the street. Plus, I support using excess fuel for high performance cars. I think fuel used for trucks and SUVs to commute to work is a waste of a precious commodity that should be reserved for pleasurable pass times like meaningless drives in the country in a sports car. People should walk to work, bike, or take a bus or a train. At the very most, people should use a small four cylinder commuter car to drive to work. Going to work is a chore and we should be the most energy efficient when commuting as part of our employment.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #37  
NNY S2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 25,660
Likes: 408
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Dec 18 2007, 01:55 PM
People should walk to work, bike, or take a bus or a train. At the very most, people should use a small four cylinder commuter car to drive to work. Going to work is a chore and we should be the most energy efficient when commuting as part of our employment.
That may work in the urban areas but not for those of us that live in the boonies and have long rides to and from work.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:58 AM
  #38  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by sireousrex,Dec 18 2007, 06:16 PM


Well done...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 04:08 AM
  #39  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Dec 18 2007, 01:55 PM
1- Yeah, but it doesn't block my view as I drive down the street.

2- Plus, I support using excess fuel for high performance cars.

3- I think fuel used for trucks and SUVs to commute to work is a waste of a precious commodity that should be reserved for pleasurable pass times like meaningless drives in the country in a sports car.

4- People should walk to work, bike, or take a bus or a train.
1- Then stop driving so close to people, back up a bit,, your view will be fine. There are plenty of people out there who get so close I can't even see their headlights or hood, just the roof. If you are driving as poorly as them, you don't deserve to see.

2- Well we agree on that...

3- The implication here then is I need another vehicle for my commute. Not all of us are as wealthy as you, I drive a truck to work because I need a truck for towing and to support my home upgrade program/rebuild.

4- Walking is absurd, it's 11 miles one way, like I have that much time to waste twice a day... Biking is totally out of the question, it would not be safe sharing the narrow country road with other cars and trucks and not even possible in the winter, this is country, we don't have sidewalks. Bus or train, just another pie-in-the-sky idea, there are no bus routes near me, and the only train is a freight train that comes through around midnight.

Your frame-of-reference may be applicable to your life, but you cannot expect everybody to fit into the same system, or, well you can expect it, but it is totally impossible in application.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 05:04 AM
  #40  
gladwins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Default

GT-R hits 0-60 in 3.3 seconds!!

We know you want the numbers and we're not going to waste your time. Neither is Nissan. Its 2009 GT-R hits 60 mph in 3.3 seconds, quicker than the last Dodge Viper, Corvette Z06 and Porsche 911 Turbo we tested. Keep your foot pinned, and after another tap on the upshift paddle it will clear the quarter-mile in 11.6 seconds at more than 120 mph.

The Corvette Z06 isn't even close. Once impressive, its 4.1-second 0-60-mph run and 12-second quarter-mile at 121.8 mph are now well off the pace, which is why Chevy is creating the supercharged Corvette ZR1
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 PM.