Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

In 180 years...

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #51  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,364
Likes: 1,614
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Nov 28 2007, 02:33 PM
What do you mean by "the sun in that galaxy"? Andromeda contains about one trillion suns. There's not really any one single brighest object in Andromeda that makes it visible - it's more akin to a big cloud of stars that we can't make out individually.
Andromeda galaxy is similar in size and structure to our galaxy. From a planet in a solar system around a star placed in a location in Andromeda Galaxy similar to the sun's location in our galaxy, viewing conditions permitting, one would likely see a grouping of stars that appeared similar to the Milky Way, representing a view of part of Andromeda Galaxy on edge. That, together with the other identifiable stars in the sky, would be the visible (very small) portion of Andromeda Galaxy.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #52  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

You want to get a sense of the size of things out there? Check out the movie The Powers of 10.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BBsOeLcUARw

A similar movie, "Cosmic Zoom"

http://youtube.com/watch?v=b8zrlOGKI2E

Our galaxy is associated with about 50 othe galaxies, in a group called the Local Group. That is, in turn, one of about a 100 ofther groups in the Virgo Supercluster. Superclusters, which are in the hundreds-of-millions-of-lightyears size range, are then composed into giant billions-of-lightyears large sheets, with great voids in between. (Think of a collection of soap bubbles, with galaxies clustered on the surfaces of the bubbles, but nothing inside the bubbles except, perhaps, small filaments made up of lines of galaxies. The filament part is a theory proposed only recently I think.)
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #53  
PalenkosBro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 959
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Nov 28 2007, 02:04 PM
You want to get a sense of the size of things out there? Check out the movie The Powers of 10.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BBsOeLcUARw

A similar movie, "Cosmic Zoom"

http://youtube.com/watch?v=b8zrlOGKI2E

Our galaxy is associated with about 50 othe galaxies, in a group called the Local Group. That is, in turn, one of about a 100 ofther groups in the Virgo Supercluster. Superclusters, which are in the hundreds-of-millions-of-lightyears size range, are then composed into giant billions-of-lightyears large sheets, with great voids in between. (Think of a collection of soap bubbles, with galaxies clustered on the surfaces of the bubbles, but nothing inside the bubbles except, perhaps, small filaments made up of lines of galaxies. The filament part is a theory proposed only recently I think.)
DEF!!!!

i gotta go to work tho guys...i hate these 16 hour days ahhh!!!!


see u guys and this topic 2moro mornin
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #54  
kumainu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Default

Sequoia trees live thousands of years.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 02:19 PM
  #55  
C U AT 9K's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 17,163
Likes: 4
Default

PalenkosBro,

where do you get your acid man??

Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #56  
tbonesteak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Default

i am a firm believer that we never landed on the moon. Glad to know i have someone that agrees with me here. in fact, there was a national survey and 40% of national citizens believed that we never landed on the moon....but ofcourse you can never assume that the survey was anything close to credible.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #57  
J_inDA_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Default

Originally Posted by C U AT 9K,Nov 28 2007, 03:19 PM
PalenkosBro,

where do you get your acid man??


I like this topic made me think, also reading it was a good way to kill 10 minutes @ work.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #58  
PrimoGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,759
Likes: 1
From: Sun★Works
Cool

Originally Posted by Elistan,Nov 28 2007, 04:40 PM
Stupid people breed faster than smart ones, so I think heads will get SMALLER as time goes on. (Not that cranial size is a predictor of intelligence, though. )
Somebody has watched the movie Idiocracy, me thinks....
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #59  
vtec9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by PalenkosBro,Nov 28 2007, 05:26 PM
ahhhh.......i believed that and thought i was the only one lol

my sociology professor even pointed it out to us
It's not a question about believing or not. This article sums it up nicely http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2006/07/71298
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #60  
Angelus1243's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
Default

............whoa man. Like whoa.

I don't have too much to add, but I'll say this little tidbit of information about Jupiter. [I forgot where I read it, but it was a credible source. I don't remember for sure whether it was theory or fact though]

The core of Jupiter is actually metal. That metal? Hydrogen. The pressure at the centre of Jupiter is so great it turned a gas into all the basic classifactions of a metal.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:21 PM.