Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Bang for the buck all around track car???

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:25 AM
  #1  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

Anyone have a feel for an all around track car (both road courses and
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 07:52 AM
  #2  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

You're asking an awful lot for $10K, aren't you? It may be a little more, but I'd go for a 3rd gen RX-7 to meet all your reqs. @ a reasonable cost. Just beware that they're not the most reliable cars (apex seals seem to be the trouble spot), but are lots of fun.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 09:36 AM
  #3  
Strike's Avatar
Former Moderator
25 Year Member
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,826
Likes: 5
From: Denver CO
Default

Yup. I'd agree on the 3rd Gen RX-7. Gorgeous to look at, fast, nimble. I'd love to have one as my hardtop track car.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:00 AM
  #4  
pellisS2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

I'll stay with the theme and recommend a Mazda, but say get a 92 or 93 1.6l or 94 or 95 1.8l Miata throw a Flyin' Miata Turbo system on it and you're doing alright. Might put you around 12 or 13k but for a combo of speed and handling, you cant do much better.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:49 AM
  #5  
Mystic_350's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Default

You guys are going to hate me for this, but oh well. You can't beat the bang for the buck of a 4th generation (93+) F-body. I'm sure you could pick up an LT1 car and modify it to outperform 95% of the cars out there for $10,000. Mustangs are notorious for that same thing as well. I've talked to guys who have less than $5,000 invested in their 5.0s and are running low 12s. They look like sh*t but they run. Throw some cash in for suspension work and you've got a great performing Stang. Because I bought my car new, it's not really a good example. But for relatively little money, I've improved the handling and horsepower of my car enormously. You may hate the way they look or the way they are put together, but if you are looking for affordable performance... there is no comparison.

Chris (NJ)
1997 Z28 M6
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 03:33 PM
  #6  
Roceye's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: Defiance
Default

I would have to go with the Mustang option. Low maint,
bullet proof (sort of) and low cost. My personal favorite
would be the Mustang SVO. A easy 300hp can be had from the turbo 2.3. The car is simple to work on and there are gobs of performance parts available for it.

How do I know all this? I did some SCCA roadracing in the eighties. My SVO was very competitive, made about 340hp (crank). Top speed was 162 mph, pulled redline in 5th. That car was so much fun. I won a couple races. Of course, I had some corporate help from Special Vehical Operations. It didn't hurt to have Bob Riley as a neighbor either. The only people who cheated more than me was the 944turbo guys.

Those bastards!

Anyway,
check out... http://www.mustangsvo.org/
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:03 PM
  #7  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

Is that the "riley & Scott" guy??? I think I just spoke to him on the phone about a EVO VI he is selling for $45k. It is located in indianapolis right now.


[QUOTE]Originally posted by Roceye
[B]
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:06 PM
  #8  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

How about a 1984 GTI? (weighs 1800lbs) $1500. spend $3k on an engine swap with 180hp (i forget the name of the place up in Massechusets), $1k on a limited slip, $1k on suspension, $1.5k on tires & wheels, $1k on brakes.

$9,000 power to weight of 10lbs per HP (same as M5), lightweight, etc.....?????

sound like a plan? Probably not as bullitproof as a Type R engined Civic though... they are more $$$ though.

Scot
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:45 PM
  #9  
Roceye's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: Defiance
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Scot
[B]Is that the "riley & Scott" guy..


The one and only...
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:46 PM
  #10  
Roceye's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: Defiance
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Scot
[B]How about a 1984 GTI?

Good choice if you don't mind three wheel cornering...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Raptor
Off-topic Talk
12
Dec 17, 2009 02:46 AM
JoeyBalls
Money and Investing
23
Feb 1, 2009 03:33 PM
VTEC Racer
Off-topic Talk
15
Aug 27, 2001 08:31 AM
boka
Off-topic Talk
39
Aug 10, 2001 04:52 AM
Schatten
Off-topic Talk
9
Jun 28, 2001 07:02 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 AM.