Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Cost of your wristwatch compared to daily wage

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:11 AM
  #21  
CKit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by PLYRS 3,Jul 4 2007, 04:57 AM
your pay scale doesn't go high enough.
That's why the last poll choice is >$5k for a watch... unless you bought a >$5k watch and it took you over three months' salary....

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #22  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 39
From: Moselle MS
Default

Originally Posted by PLYRS 3,Jul 4 2007, 09:07 AM
^ that'll be pricey for authentic parts.

seriously, i'd leave it.
Cost really isnt an factor, or would you think that its value could diminish if
i did have it redone ?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #23  
GT_2003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s2000raj,Jul 4 2007, 07:59 AM
braggart.
is it bragging now to tell people you spent more than 3 months salary on a watch?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:20 AM
  #24  
CKit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by GT_2003,Jul 4 2007, 08:53 AM
is it bragging now to tell people you spent more than 3 months salary on a watch?
You love my threads, dontcha?

Happy 4th!

Time to go out for a drive!

And it's not bragging to tell people you spent more than 3 months salary on a watch... if you only make $1000 per month, that's kind of disproportionate. I think he misread the poll choices and thought there wasn't a category for >$5,000 watches.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #25  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

Originally Posted by FILTHY BEAST,Jul 4 2007, 12:14 PM
Cost really isnt an factor, or would you think that its value could diminish if i did have it redone ?
for me, the value in your watch is that it is a vintage (and i assume authentic) Rolex.

unless you can get all of those replaced with circa 1982 parts, i would just rather buy a current GMT.

your beautiful, vintage 25 year-old GMT will be updated with a 2007 bezel, sapphire and bracelet....well, what's left?

you see what i'm getting at?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #26  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Jul 4 2007, 01:20 PM
I think he misread the poll choices and thought there wasn't a category for >$5,000 watches.
no, i didn't.

you're missing one. but if i point it out, that would be bragging.

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #27  
CKit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by PLYRS 3,Jul 4 2007, 09:24 AM
no, i didn't.

you're missing one. but if i point it out, that would be bragging.

Then maybe my choices are unclear.

If you make $20,000 per month and your watch costs $10,000...

You still pick the last option: Because it did take you less than three months to buy your watch that cost more than $5000.

If you make $100,000 per DAY and your watch costs $80,000...
You still pick the last option: Because it did take you less than three months to buy your watch that cost more than $5000.

Doesn't matter if you paid for the watch with one day's wages. It still took you under three months. Was trying to separate out the people living with their mothers who bought $10,000 watches but only make $1000 per month.

PM me the answer choice that you fit into that isn't available, please.
The stupid poll is limited to 10 choices.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #28  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Jul 4 2007, 01:41 PM
Then maybe my choices are unclear.

If you make $20,000 per month and your watch costs $10,000...

You still pick the last option: Because it did take you less than three months to buy your watch that cost more than $5000.

If you make $100,000 per DAY and your watch costs $80,000...
You still pick the last option: Because it did take you less than three months to buy your watch that cost more than $5000.

Doesn't matter if you paid for the watch with one day's wages. It still took you under three months. Was trying to separate out the people living with their mothers who bought $10,000 watches but only make $1000 per month.

PM me the answer choice that you fit into that isn't available, please.
The stupid poll is limited to 10 choices.
in that case, i'll vote now.

but yes, it was unclear.

basically, everything was "less than", and then the final choice (only) was "more than".

this would not have held up in stats class....but i know you're limited by the site parameters.


Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:11 AM
  #29  
Mindcore's Avatar
Former Moderator
25 Year Member
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,175
Likes: 0
From: Erock is da shizzle
Default

Dude, stop being ghey
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #30  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

but i am.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.