February 2009
it's really funny to me the number of people who think they are "with it," and well-informed simply because they have a new, expensive TV, yet have absolutely no clue LOL
Assuming analog broadcast does finally end on the projected date, who has benefitted at that point? I'm struggling to find any evidence that life on Earth will improve significantly. Watching TV on a poor signal certainly won't suddenly become more pleasant. As far as I can tell, the only thing that is supposed to end is high-power TV broadcast in analog. Low power and rural stations will continue to provide analog service, meaning that most rural and urban areas will still get analog broadcast channels. Cable and satellite will continue to do whatever the companies wish, including providing analog signals.
And as has been said, digital IS NOT HD. All the fools who bought HD TV's with the dream of watching all channels in HD will continue to lose sleep at night
And as has been said,
Assuming analog broadcast does finally end on the projected date, who has benefitted at that point? I'm struggling to find any evidence that life on Earth will improve significantly. Watching TV on a poor signal certainly won't suddenly become more pleasant. As far as I can tell, the only thing that is supposed to end is high-power TV broadcast in analog. Low power and rural stations will continue to provide analog service, meaning that most rural and urban areas will still get analog broadcast channels. Cable and satellite will continue to do whatever the companies wish, including providing analog signals.
And as has been said, digital IS NOT HD. All the fools who bought HD TV's with the dream of watching all channels in HD will continue to lose sleep at night

And as has been said,
Originally Posted by GT_2003,Feb 4 2008, 06:26 PM
it's really funny to me the number of people who think they are "with it," and well-informed simply because they have a new, expensive TV, yet have absolutely no clue LOL
Assuming analog broadcast does finally end on the projected date, who has benefitted at that point? I'm struggling to find any evidence that life on Earth will improve significantly. Watching TV on a poor signal certainly won't suddenly become more pleasant. As far as I can tell, the only thing that is supposed to end is high-power TV broadcast in analog. Low power and rural stations will continue to provide analog service, meaning that most rural and urban areas will still get analog broadcast channels. Cable and satellite will continue to do whatever the companies wish, including providing analog signals.
Assuming analog broadcast does finally end on the projected date, who has benefitted at that point? I'm struggling to find any evidence that life on Earth will improve significantly. Watching TV on a poor signal certainly won't suddenly become more pleasant. As far as I can tell, the only thing that is supposed to end is high-power TV broadcast in analog. Low power and rural stations will continue to provide analog service, meaning that most rural and urban areas will still get analog broadcast channels. Cable and satellite will continue to do whatever the companies wish, including providing analog signals.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







