Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

HDMI vs Component

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #31  
chrissa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

This bickering back and forth about whether HDMI or component video is better is just stupid. Either format is only as good as the engineers who designed and built the devices generating and decoding these signals. And it's not like there is only one project team out there that created both. There are tons of examples of both technologies, and some of these are gonna be crap.

So, if you're going to say that one is better than the other, at least say exactly what it is that you are comparing. I can tell you that when looking at a Motorola 6412 Phase 3 HDTV cable box and a Daytek 32" LCD TV, the color on component video actually looks slightly better than HDMI. And I'm certainly not the only person who thinks that.

As for the super cheap HDMI cables (like the 99 cent eBay ones), I've seen them in person, and they are build and work just fine. You would have to be doing a pretty extreme install to ever need anything more than what those cables provide.

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #32  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

You would have to be doing a pretty extreme install to ever need anything more than what those cables provide.
Oversimplistic that statement is. Odds are the shit cables are good for <3 or even 5 foot runs.

These days with hidden components for OTW installs runs are getting really, really long.

This bickering back and forth about whether HDMI or component video is better is just stupid.
Yup.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #33  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

chris is right.

if a company puts super crappy TDMI chips into their TVs, the DVI/HDMI will not be very good. Same if they use bad chips to encode the component video.

for DVD, component in theory is a great choice because it mirrors very closely how the data is stored on the disc. Component video is kind of a mix between analog and digital. The signal is analog, but the color has been broken out via a digital algorithm so that when recombined will come out better than just by using standard RGB.

For HDTV, DVI/HDMI (same thing video wise) in theory is your best choice. Of course, if the TDMI or Video DACs are not up to snuff, will suck.

BTW, component and RGB are very very different to those who don't know. Both have a Red, Green, and Blue cable but could not be more different. They are totally incompatible, too.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #34  
chrissa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Dec 17 2005, 07:24 PM
Oversimplistic that statement is. Odds are the shit cables are good for <3 or even 5 foot runs.

These days with hidden components for OTW installs runs are getting really, really long.
Yes, that was an overly simplistic statement. Your point that installs in homes are getting longer is true. But you need to understand the limitations of the DVI standard. It says that a device is compliant if it can transmit up to 5 meters. It also says that DVI cables of up to 5 meters should be able to transmit a signal from a DVI compliant device. Some manufacturers are building devices that are capable of transmitting further. But honestly, if you want to run 30 to 40 foot lengths in your walls, DVI might not be the answer.

And for the comment that the shit cables are good for less than 3 feet, if you consider that blanket statement covers the majority of 99 cent eBay cables, then it's completely wrong. The 10 foot HDMI and DVI "shit" cables that I have work just fine and certainly meet the DVI standards. The Koreans make a better cable then you think (hell, I wouldn't be surprised if the $30 cable from your local store and the 99 cent eBay cable came from the same factory). And again, I'm definitely not the only one who has successfully used one of these cables.

Chris.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #35  
Carlson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Dec 16 2005, 12:00 PM
No -- it does in fact not look any better or worse. And yes, you can get shitty cables for cheap. Good HDMI's are still way out there.

Good article on the subject:

http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messa...79/122868.html

FWIW I do my comparisons on our KV34XBR2 tube HD set. This is the same set when properly setup that almost all folks use as the baseline for HD comparison.
KV34XBR2 is a POS (Today's standard), I got rid of it almost 2 yrs ago...
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #36  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

I don't know about that. Tubes still have the best picture quality hands down, and the Sony XBRs are considered the best in the 32-40" sizes. Most LCDs blow in brightness distribution, overall response time, and are not so good on color deviation either.

POS? I think not.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #37  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

KV34XBR2 is a POS (Today's standard), I got rid of it almost 2 yrs ago...
They are still the reference for almost all comparisons and considered to be either the best or one of the two best screens out there.

Of course -- if you did in fact have one you got rid of it after a year as they debuted in 2001.

My plasma and LCD's in comparison are worse -- about on average with the 27" toshiba in the garage.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #38  
kadeshpa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 0
From: Oh kwa tan zen wan
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Dec 17 2005, 05:11 PM
Again, yours perhaps but I would wager 100 bucks you have not done back to back. The experts never agree on anything but you will find very few who pick HDMI over Component at this point. No need really.
PM me for details on providing me my $100 I have done each. I've used Avia to tune my set and later had it professionally tuned. I am not running a tube set, rather a Hitachi RPTV 51" s715 with a direct OTA feed and a feed through Dish Networks. I have a Tosh upconvert dvd which has HDMI as well. I made it a point to test the two diff connections and did find hdmi to be the best for me as well as many of my friends that have HD setups.

Hands down though, the OTA broadcasts provide the absolute best HD I've seen to date.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #39  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

This thread has really struck a cord!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #40  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,425
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by jasonw,Dec 19 2005, 09:33 AM
This thread has really struck a cord!
At least there haven't been any shameless plugs. . .
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM.