Hot Import Nights-SF
well from the police officers i know in orlando they have a certain number of tickets they must issue every month to show that they are actively doing there job...and i would assume this is so the police stations can get more money
Originally Posted by FL05S2K,Sep 26 2006, 09:41 AM
well from the police officers i know in orlando they have a certain number of tickets they must issue every month to show that they are actively doing there job...and i would assume this is so the police stations can get more money
From ticketassassin.com (a must for every CA resident):
(other citations): Ask him about his ticket "quota" indirectly:
Motorist: "Officer, are you permitted to give me a warning or are you required to only write citations today?
Officer: "They sent me here to write tickets, not to give warnings."
Motorist: "I thought you were here to promote traffic safety; what you described sounds like a quota." (quota's are illegal: VC 41602)
(Officers can always write a warning for a 1 point infraction, so if he tells you he can't, he's indirectly admitting to some sort of directed quota.)
Motorist: "Officer, are you permitted to give me a warning or are you required to only write citations today?
Officer: "They sent me here to write tickets, not to give warnings."
Motorist: "I thought you were here to promote traffic safety; what you described sounds like a quota." (quota's are illegal: VC 41602)
(Officers can always write a warning for a 1 point infraction, so if he tells you he can't, he's indirectly admitting to some sort of directed quota.)
Originally Posted by 8D_In_Trunk,Sep 26 2006, 09:19 AM
Wherein did I say it was "sleazy?" I'm just clarifying it for those that think that ticketing (including most traffic stops) is for the sake of upholding the law.
besides, even if issuing traffic violation citations and fines are not for upholding the law but merely for generating revenue, the fact that cops are issuing citations has a great affect on most people's driving behavior. most, including myself, would perform more "illegal" traffic manuevers more frequently, if not all the time, if we knew that we will absolutely not be penalize for it. so i don't know about you, but i much prefer that people have the fear and incentive to abide by traffic rules because of potential citations and fines, than to be on the road with a bunch of drivers who does what he/she wants when he/she wants.
Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Sep 26 2006, 06:57 PM
fine. remove the word "sleazy", and my point does not change one single bit. bottom line is that every city needs to find ways to generate revenue. hypothetically, city x can completely not issue parking/traffic citation fines, but then they will have to find other ways to generate the funds to run the city, such as raising taxes. are you telling me that you much prefer that your city raises sales tax, gas tax, property tax, registration fees, etc. for everyone instead of issuing parking/traffic citiations to generate the extra money?? you and i can prevent ourselves from getting parking/traffic citations, but we cannot do anything about the increase in tax rates that are manatorily imposed on everyone in the city.
. . .
. . .
Originally Posted by LuDawg,Sep 23 2006, 08:18 PM
The cops were hating on anyone who did not have a front liscense plate.
Is there a difference between hating something and hating on that same something? If so, what is it?
Twenty-seven years ago I was on my honeymoon. I had a 911S at the time. My wife pulled out of a driveway and heard something scraping in the front of the car, so she backed up, then pulled out again: no scraping.
Two days later I noticed that the front plate was gone. I went back to that driveway and found it; when she backed up it caught on the lip of the driveway. It had been run over a number of times and was in pretty bad shape, so I tossed it on the floor in the back.
Several years later I was pulled over for lack of a front license plate. "Oh no, officer, it's right here. It came off when my wife was driving, I found it, I'm heading home right now where I have the screws to remount it." The officer let me go. Everything I told him was true. Note that I never said that I intended to remount it; only that I had the necessary hardware at home.
Two days later I noticed that the front plate was gone. I went back to that driveway and found it; when she backed up it caught on the lip of the driveway. It had been run over a number of times and was in pretty bad shape, so I tossed it on the floor in the back.
Several years later I was pulled over for lack of a front license plate. "Oh no, officer, it's right here. It came off when my wife was driving, I found it, I'm heading home right now where I have the screws to remount it." The officer let me go. Everything I told him was true. Note that I never said that I intended to remount it; only that I had the necessary hardware at home.
Originally Posted by 8D_In_Trunk,Sep 27 2006, 09:05 AM
So, what if you're 16 and driving?
besides, you're only a minor driver for a few years. eventually, the minor will become a full functioning member of society and he/she will have to deal with higher tax rates for the rest of his/her life which can last on average another 30-40 years.
Originally Posted by magician,Sep 27 2006, 09:20 AM
Several years later I was pulled over for lack of a front license plate. "Oh no, officer, it's right here. It came off when my wife was driving, I found it, I'm heading home right now where I have the screws to remount it." The officer let me go. Everything I told him was true. Note that I never said that I intended to remount it; only that I had the necessary hardware at home.
it's a damn law if it's required you should just have it on. what's the big deal bout front plates? i always have my plates on getting pulled over for that kind of bs will just ruin my day and will cost me $101 i rather just keep it on and be safe.






