Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Intersting Debate

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 03:01 AM
  #1  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default Intersting Debate


Do you think a computer can ever be as "smart" as a human brain?

Before you answer, consider both sides of the argument....

Side A - A computer can make greater calculations, faster, more accurately than a human brain.

Side B - Since a computer, regardless of how advanced, still needs to be built/programmed by a human, so no, it can't be "smarter" than a human brain.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 03:15 AM
  #2  
Nandska's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 75
From: VA
Default

Good question, but I'll bite.

I would say, yes to a point. The reason why is because we are becoming more and more dependent on technology that parts of our brain that we use for calculations and such will not be as stimulated and that part of the brain will become more dormant. But if we were actually using 100% of our brain, no I wouldn't think so (IIRC, we only used 15% of our brain, but don't quote me on it ).

It will come to a point to where even if a computer is wrong, people will believe it's right. It's like someone asking you what color grass is. And of course, you know it's green. But if everyone keeps saying it's blue, in time, you will start to second guess yourself and start to believe it's blue.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 03:19 AM
  #3  
619Nick06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Side B - not a chance

There are simply too many variables and outcomes in any given situation for a computer to react as intelligently as a human.

In order for Side A to be true, it would require a computer that has been programmed to every single outcome of every single question/problem/situation and what have you. I can't imagine how long it would take for that to be possible.

Mathematically, with computations, sure. Throw a certain problem at a computer and you'll lock it up. Hell, a computer gives an error when dividing by zero. We humans know there's no possible solution. Simple example.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 03:26 AM
  #4  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Interesting debate. While I personally believe in option B, let's spice things up a bit....

99% of the time, with accidents happening on computerized devices (trains, planes, cars, etc) the error lies with the human, not the computer.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 04:21 AM
  #5  
Nandska's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 75
From: VA
Default

Almost reminds me of the Numbers episode that had to do with the Turing Test. The AI was only programmed to pass this test. It would go out to the internet and find the best answer to every answer to prove it could pass it.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 04:22 AM
  #6  
BearNVa's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 0
From: Fajardo
Default

Originally Posted by Nandska,Mar 19 2009, 06:15 AM
But if we were actually using 100% of our brain, no I wouldn't think so (IIRC, we only used 15% of our brain, but don't quote me on it ).
Ooops... I quoted you.

10% of Usage = False We actually use all of our brain.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 04:25 AM
  #7  
Nandska's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 75
From: VA
Default



By that article, I stand corrected. Figured you would chime in Bill.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 04:41 AM
  #8  
BearNVa's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 0
From: Fajardo
Default

Originally Posted by Nandska,Mar 19 2009, 07:25 AM


By that article, I stand corrected. Figured you would chime in Bill.
I had to considering only 10% of my brain works... figured that would be it's excerise for the day...
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 04:42 AM
  #9  
Nandska's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 75
From: VA
Default

Don't get me wrong. I think Option B. The brain is too complex and once it is fully understood, then maybe (a big maybe) will a computer be as smart. But I don't think it will ever have "free will". Computers are based on one's and zeros, it's either yes or no.

I guess my arguement is more based on, people will become so dependent on technology that they will become as "dumb" as computers.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 05:01 AM
  #10  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

A digital computer is certainly capable of it.
No idea if people will ever create one such.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 AM.