Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Intersting Debate

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #61  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,425
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by thebig33tuna,Mar 24 2009, 10:02 AM
damn 8d ninja edits fast.
And responds faster. . .

Respect the PWA badge.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #62  
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #63  
christopherboon's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: sparta, nj/ nyc
Default

We cannot force a creative element into a computer this is what is driving our current technology revolution and all the revolutions before it. It has no consideration only logic and the definition of what intellegence is, is so vague the answer is impossible to define. Can a computer be more logical than a human being through decifering possible soltions and causes at a faster rate? yes. Can it account for emotions and circumstances that a machine can never understand no. Our intellegence will always be more applicable to areas other than the given enumerted quantitive explanation. so the answer it can think faster but unless someone programs every possible personality type and pretty much every aspect of everything ever in exsistence into a given computer than it will never out weigh the general intellegence of the average human being. Albeit some people are simply retarded. there are game boys more intellegent then the,
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #64  
christopherboon's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: sparta, nj/ nyc
Default

them* many gramatical mistakes were made but i dont give a shit lol you know what i mean
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #65  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

The created cannot be considered smarter than the creator until the creator is no longer required by the created.

I don't ever see that happening, quite frankly. A computer would need some ultra-serious programming logic to be able to absorb the incredible amounts of data we receive daily as humans, then link it together to derive "new" information. We are smart because we process everything we see, hear, taste, touch, and smell and then combine that data to "create" new things. A computer can take in the data but it'll take a human to put it together. The logic rules are too complex, and even illogical at times, to allow a computer the same flexibility.

A computer has to "start" somewhere and that always includes a human. Ergo, the computer will always be reliant on a human and, as such, limited by its own creator. A computer can appear more intelligent purely on the basis of its data and objective reasoning but ultimately, it's still just a tool in our hands.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 07:32 AM
  #66  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Mar 25 2009, 02:20 PM
...it's still just a tool in our hands.
That's what























she said.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #67  
S2k_MoZo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

The only thing computer lacks is the power to make decisions...which humans do have...

They are still doing research in AI to make computers smart but without and input, there is no output...computers are dumb and useless without us....?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 08:15 AM
  #68  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Reported on slashdot today:
"European researchers have taken a step towards replicating the functioning of the brain in silicon, creating new custom chip with the equivalent of 200,000 neurons linked up by 50 million synaptic connections. The aim of the Fast Analog Computing with Emergent Transient States (FACETS) project is to better understand how to construct massively parallel computer systems modeled on a biological brain. Unlike IBM's Blue Brain project, which involves modeling a brain in software, this approach makes it much easier to create a truly parallel computing system. The set-up also features a distributed algorithm that introduces an element of plasticity, allowing the circuit to learn and adapt. The researchers plan to connect several chips to create a circuit with a billion neurons and 10^13 synapses (about a tenth of the complexity of the human brain)."
http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?.../03/25/1452209
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 08:23 AM
  #69  
S2k_MoZo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Wow....that is insane!!!
Soon the world will be taken over by robots....just like the movie AI?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VTEC_Junkie
Off-topic Talk
12
Mar 7, 2005 01:27 PM
Holman
Off-topic Talk
14
May 19, 2003 09:56 AM
velocity
Off-topic Talk
15
Mar 3, 2003 01:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM.