Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Just a liiiittttle too low...

Old Jul 15, 2009 | 07:21 PM
  #21  
SgtB's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 8
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

If you know how big a F18 is in person, you can tell that's a far enough away pass.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #22  
Skuzzy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,644
Likes: 0
From: panhandle state
Default

Originally Posted by zzziippyyy,Jul 15 2009, 07:15 PM
^ not even us now that the gubment wont fund em
Err...

We have 130 already and are not going to scrap them. The gov canceled the order for an additional 170 and retains the ability to order more in the future.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #23  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

ok ok we got 130 i stand corrected
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #24  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

The F18 is big. Even bigger than the new Camaro!

F18s have buzzed Detroit before. With a long zoom, proper timing, and the right spot, there's no reason this shot couldn't be legit.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rimgbzdS7Ro [/media]
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 07:30 AM
  #25  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,377
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Skuzzy,Jul 15 2009, 05:46 PM
The f22 is awesome, but buying any more of them is a severe misallocation of defense spending. 140 million for a plane with capabilities which will, in all likelihood, never be necessary. Maybe in peacetime (damn Chinese!), but not with 2 wars going on - and especially when more f22s won't aid in attaining the objectives of those two wars.
Wrong. We're going to tangle with the Chinese sometime down the road and we need to maintain air superiority. Iraq and Afghanistan aren't indicative of the high tech threats we will need to be able to confront. Balls to the wall with the multipurpose F35 Joint Strike Fighter compromise aircraft may not cut it. I don't want to find out.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #26  
GateCrasher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,078
Likes: 1
From: Here
Default

Originally Posted by The Raptor,Jul 16 2009, 10:30 AM
Wrong. We're going to tangle with the Chinese sometime down the road and we need to maintain air superiority. Iraq and Afghanistan aren't indicative of the high tech threats we will need to be able to confront. Balls to the wall with the F35 Joint Strike Fighter may not cut it.
I don't know much about military vehicles, aircrafts, and vessels...
Please enlighten me... What do the Chinese have that would match or even threaten US air supremacy?
I've always heard that The US, Israel, GB have the best airforce units.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 08:12 AM
  #27  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,377
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Originally Posted by GateCrasher,Jul 16 2009, 08:53 AM
I don't know much about military vehicles, aircrafts, and vessels...
Please enlighten me... What do the Chinese have that would match or even threaten US air supremacy?
I've always heard that The US, Israel, GB have the best airforce units.
http://www.comw.org/cmp/fulltext/iddschina.html
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 08:19 AM
  #28  
GateCrasher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,078
Likes: 1
From: Here
Default

Originally Posted by The Raptor,Jul 16 2009, 11:12 AM
Thanks.

Based on that It looks like they pose more threat to Taiwan and East Asia than anywhere else really. At least for the time being.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #29  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,377
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Originally Posted by GateCrasher,Jul 16 2009, 09:19 AM
Thanks.

Based on that It looks like they pose more threat to Taiwan and East Asia than anywhere else really. At least for the time being.
Yeah, but if we have to confront them, it will most likely be in that part of the world.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #30  
Skuzzy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,644
Likes: 0
From: panhandle state
Default

Stuck in the cold war are we?

Ain't gonna happen.

"Despite decades of work, the only original combat aircraft to be designed and produced in China are the J-8 and JH-7, both of which took so long to develop that by the time they entered service, they were already obsolete by Western standards. The newer J-10, which has been in development for twenty years, probably won't enter service for another five years."

What in the world are we going to fight them for? Taiwan? Cross straight relations are much warmer and trending upwards. Sparks will always fly given the Chinese government's politicization of nationalism, but neither they, Taiwan, nor the USA will ever light the match. Even historically China has not expanded territorially unlike other ascendant great powers. Nor is invasion fitting with their FP objectives. China has aggressively pursued a soft power approach in SE asia in order to strengthen its position as the power player within the existing international political economy. Sure sure, China is big, often bewildering, and its rise is incredibly unique. But they aren't stupid.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.